Skip to main content

Feasibility and acceptability of a contextualized physical activity and diet intervention for the control of hypertension in adults from a rural subdistrict: a study protocol (HYPHEN)

Abstract

Introduction

In rural and remote South Africa, most strokes and ischaemic heart diseases are as a consequence of hypertension, which is a modifiable risk factor. The widely recommended therapeutic approaches to control hypertension are through physical activity and diet modifications. However, there is a lack of culturally sensitive community-based, lifestyle interventions to control hypertension among rural African adult populations. We designed an intervention which recommends adjusting daily routine physical activity and dietary behaviour of adults with hypertension. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of HYPHEN in a rural community setting.

Methods

We aim to recruit 30 adult participants with a self-report hypertension diagnosis. A one-arm, prospective design will be used to assess the feasibility and acceptability of recruitment, uptake, engagement, and completion of the 10-week intervention. Recruitment rates will be assessed at week 0. Intervention uptake, engagement, and adherence to the intervention will be assessed weekly via telephone. Blood pressure, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, urinary sodium, accelerometer-measured physical activity, and 24-h diet recall will be assessed at baseline and at 10 weeks. Qualitative semi-structured interviews will be conducted at 10 weeks to explore feasibility and acceptability.

Discussion

This study offers a person-centred, sociocultural approach to hypertension control through adaptations to physical activity and dietary intake. This study will determine whether HYPHEN is feasible and acceptable and will inform changes to the protocol/focus that could be tested in a full trial.

Trial registration number

PACTR202306662753321.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The World Health Organization projects that in the African region, by 2030, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) will be the biggest cause of death [1]. The relative burden of NCDs is expected to increase as both HIV-/AIDS-related mortality declines with the roll-out of antiretroviral therapy and the region continues to experience the rapid urbanization of communities [2]. Hypertension, stroke, and ischaemic heart disease are among the most common NCDs causing premature deaths among adults living in South Africa [3]. Over half of strokes and ischaemic heart disease in South Africa are caused by hypertension, and these cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are reported to be more prevalent in rural areas compared to urban areas [3].

The high prevalence of hypertension in South Africa will likely result in increased mortality and morbidity in rural compared to urban areas due, in part, to poorly organized health care systems, intermittent drug supply, and shortage of health care workers [4,5,6]. Reduced salt and caloric intake and increase in physical activity are the widely recommended therapeutic approaches to meeting national hypertension targets [7,8,9].

There is a paucity of research that provides a profile of daily physical activity practices of rural South African adults living with hypertension. A study by Oyeyemi and colleagues [10] assessed physical activity for rural South Africans using short versions of physical activity subjective assessment which does not provide information about the domain of physical activity (transportation, job, leisure, and housework) performed each day. Another study using a short version physical activity questionnaire by Smart Mabweazara [11] in the general population concluded that adults in rural Western Cape engaged in more physical activity than urban adults from the same province. A further study by Tomaz and colleagues [12] assessed physical activity for middle-aged and older rural adults and recommended that physical activity interventions should be targeted for adults from the age of 40 years in order to provide health benefits earlier in life.

Available literature on dietary practices of rural South African adults has provided successful intervention recommendations for hypertension, but the recommendations are not sustained in the long run. For example, a study by Charlton and colleagues [13] provided recommendations of food replacement which participants could not afford due to high unemployment rates in rural South Africa and the fact that recommended food was not part of the participants’ daily diet [14]. Another study by Najam and colleagues [15] reported that adults in rural South Africa have good nutrition knowledge, but this did not translate into regular healthy nutrition practices. The literature on physical activity and diet practices for rural South African adults points to a need to have better understanding of the sociocultural influences so that interventions targeting the control of hypertension can consider the realities of this population.

To the authors’ knowledge, there are no interventions to test whether adaptations in physical activity and diet focusing on a contextualized structured health promotion approach could lower high blood pressure in a rural South African adult population with hypertension [16, 17]. There is a need for studies to investigate the feasibility of implementing such interventions. A contextualized intervention is one that is adapted to the local context of the target population and informed by the population needs. Many adults in rural South Africa are involved in daily manual labour as part of their activities of daily living, but this is performed at low intensity and is not well documented [10]. Common manual labour activities reported by adults living in rural South Africa include walking for wood collection, different aspects of farming, yardwork, walking as a means of transport, and housework. These activities are not adequate to paint a full picture of the daily routine practices of rural adults and need further exploration [16, 18]. There is lack of information regarding the type, frequency, and intensity of physical activities performed by rural South African adults. Moreover, many diet-based interventions are usually not affordable due to high costs or not accepted by the rural adults due lack of availability and contextual considerations, hence the need for tailor-made interventions that consider the contextual realities of the population [19, 20].

We followed a systematic process to design an evidence and theory-informed contextualized 10-week physical activity and diet intervention which recommends adjusting routine physical activity and diet practices for the control of hypertension using the intervention mapping (IM) protocol [21] — HYPHEN (HYpertension control using PHysical activity and diEt in a rural coNtext). Intervention mapping is used as a planning approach to develop theory- and evidence-based health promoting intervention programmes. Intervention mapping has been suggested as a useful and effective tool to further improve the development and application of theories to promote nutrition and physical activity [22]. The tasks in the IM protocol are iterative with the programme planner revisiting previous steps throughout the process so that all objectives, outcomes, and determinants are addressed. This process allows for the development and delivery of the intervention to be replicated.

Aim and objectives

The aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a contextually appropriate educational programme for hypertension control in adults from a rural South African population.

The primary objectives of the study are as follows:

  1. a)

    To present the social and cultural beliefs, perceptions, and practices regarding physical activity and diet which influenced the development of an intervention for the control of hypertension in adults living in rural South Africa

  2. b)

    To implement a contextually appropriate educational intervention programme for the control of hypertension using physical activity and diet

  3. c)

    To determine feasibility of the intervention through assessing recruitment, retention, and attrition rates, intervention uptake, engagement, adherence to the intervention, completion, and the evaluation measures

  4. d)

    To determine acceptability of the intervention through individual interviews

  5. e)

    To assess fidelity of intervention delivery using a checklist centred around the behaviour change techniques

The secondary objective of the study is as follows:

  1. a)

    To present descriptive statistics data on health-related indicators (blood pressure, physical activity, diet consumption, body mass index, urine sodium, and waist-hip ratio) before and after the intervention.

Methods

Study design

This feasibility study will be a one-arm community-based, prospective study. Feasibility and acceptability of recruitment, the intervention (HYPHEN), and associated outcome measures will be assessed using a mixed-method approach.

Study site and population

This study will be conducted at Bushbuckridge subdistrict in Mpumalanga province where the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) has been running since 1992. The Agincourt HDSS covers an area of 450 km2 with 116,000 individuals (approximately 52,000 older than 18 years) living in approximately 20,000 households distributed in 31 villages [23,24,25]. We will sample adults aged 40 years and above within the Agincourt HDSS from the Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH (International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health) community in South Africa (HAALSI) [26]. The prevalence of hypertension in this subdistrict for people aged 40 years and above is 57%, defined as a self-reported diagnosis of hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg) or self-reported taking medications for hypertension control [26].

Sample size

A study which provides guidance on conducting feasibility studies by Tickle-Degnen [27] states that feasibility studies are not expected to have large sample sizes as they do not need to power statistical null hypothesis testing. However, Arian and colleagues [28] in their review of current best practice state that the sample size of feasibility studies should be adequate to estimate critical parameters such as recruitment rate. An overall sample size of 30 has been recommended by Lancaster, Dodd, and Williamson [29]. We will aim to recruit 30 participants at the beginning of the intervention.

Patient identification, consent process, and ethical considerations

Eligible participants will be invited telephonically via the Agincourt HDSS from a cohort of adults with hypertension. The details of the study will be explained through a telephone call, and if the adult demonstrates interest, a household visit will be conducted to provide further information, answer any questions, and obtain written informed consent to participate. The study has received the necessary ethical clearance from the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (clearance number: M 210282) and the local Provincial Department of Health Research and Ethics Committee (clearance number: MP_202106_001). We do not anticipate any adverse events to occur because of participating in this intervention; therefore, no data monitoring committee will be required. Participants already taking antihypertensive medications will continue this treatment as usual.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 40 years and older

  • Self-reported diagnosis of hypertension or self-reported taking medications for hypertension control

  • Lived in the district study setting for minimum 6 months prior to start of intervention.

Exclusion criteria

  • Dependent on wheelchairs for mobility

Preparation procedures

The primary author will train three research assistants on the entire protocol of the study including questionnaire administration, anthropometric measurements, and education of the participants. The summary of the study schedule is outlined in Table 1.

Table 1 COM-B component and behaviour change techniques (BCT) used in the structured group education session targeting hypertension

Intervention

The intervention will comprise of three components: a structured group education session, individualized physical activity education, and individualized dietary education over a period of 10 weeks (Tables 1, 2 and 3). The duration of the intervention was informed by recommendations from similar studies [30, 31]. The three components of the intervention were informed by a needs assessment from unpublished data. The first part of the needs assessment established the profile of physical activity levels of hypertensive adults in the rural subdistrict. Results found that males reported more vigorous physical activity than females at work. Females reported high frequency of moderate-intensity physical activity inside and outside the house. The second part explored the sociocultural perceptions about physical activity and dietary practices which influence behaviour change for the control of hypertension in adults from the rural subdistrict. Some key findings included a lack of variety in the daily consumed diet, and the usual diet was mainly influenced by affordability and availability. Physical activity practices were mainly influenced by community perceptions of age- and gender-related roles.

Table 2 COM-B component and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) targeting individual’s physical activity behaviour
Table 3 COM-B component and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) targeting individual’s dietary behaviour change

The design of the intervention was underpinned by the COM-B model by Michie, Van Stralen, and West [32] (Fig. 1). The model identifies three factors that need to be present for any behaviour to occur — Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation. Capability is defined as the individual’s psychological and physical capability to engage in the activity concerned. The capability includes having the necessary knowledge and skills. Opportunity is defined as all the factors external to the individual and prompt or make the behaviour possible. Motivation is defined as brain processes that energize and direct behaviour, and it includes habitual processes, emotional responding, and analytical decision-making. Potential influence between components in the model can occur, for example opportunity and capability can influence motivation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

COM-B model of behaviour change [32]

Intervention component one: structured group education

Participants of the intervention will be invited to a common location in small groups (of between 6 and 10). The main focus of the group education will be to enhance capability through shaping knowledge and skills to engage in the proposed intervention. The trained research assistants will deliver the education using a printed educational pamphlet. Some topics to be covered in the discussion (informed by a contextual need assessment) will include knowledge about what causes hypertension and normal blood pressure values, knowledge on ways to control blood pressure such as reducing salt intake and increasing physical activity, awareness of social triggers/barriers such as cooking for the family, awareness, and correction regarding common myths. The group education is expected to last up to 90 min per session.

Intervention component two: individualized physical activity education

Participants who attended the group education session will be visited at their home by a trained research assistant to provide individual education on physical activity. Capability will be enhanced by first asking the individual to set goals by identifying the physical activities which they perform as part of their daily routine from a list (informed by a needs assessment). The research assistant will educate the participant on how to adapt performance of the physical activities. This may include changing positions (from sitting) when performing activities, increasing pace of usual active daily tasks, and avoiding sedentary behaviour. Opportunity will be enhanced by emphasizing the importance and benefits of moderate-to-high intensity physical activities on hypertension control. Participants will be motivated by weekly telephone calls where they will be asked to indicate which activities they were able to achieve that week and encouraged where they fall short. The research assistant will keep record of everyone’s weekly performance so that feedback and motivation can be enhanced during weekly telephone feedback.

Intervention component three: individualized dietary education

To enhance capability, individual education on how to make dietary changes will be provided on the same visit as the physical activity education. The research assistant will provide education on food items which contains high sodium content from the participant’s usual diet, education on reduction of salt consumption and high salt spices, finding alternative options for food with lower sodium content (for example brown bread instead of white bread), limiting cooking salt to one teaspoon per day, and removing salt from the table during meals. Opportunity for consuming healthier food items will be enhanced by encouraging habitual consumption of self-grown vegetables and naturally growing wild herbs which participants already have access to in their communities. Participants will be motivated through weekly monitoring calls where they will be asked to list which dietary adjustments they achieved weekly. The research assistant will keep record of everyone’s weekly dietary habits so that feedback and motivation can be enhanced during weekly telephone feedback.

The authors are cognizance of the under-pinning theories that influence behaviour change such as the social cognitive theory [33]. The primary variable of interest in this theory of motivation is self-efficacy, which concerns someone’s belief in his/her capabilities to successfully execute necessary courses of action to satisfy situational demands [33, 34]. According to Bandura [34], a high expectation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy leads to greater adherence to a recommended activity (in our case, physical activity and diet adaptations). Alongside the COM-B model, we developed taxonomies of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) (Tables 1, 2 and 3) to identify active intervention ingredients and allow for future replication [35, 36]. The BCTs are classified using the Behaviour Change Taxonomy [36].

The scope and sequence of the intervention are provided in Table 4. The intervention will run over a period of 10 weeks. During week 0, baseline individual assessments of blood pressure, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, and urine sample collection will be conducted. Participants will be asked to wear a wrist-worn accelerometer for seven consecutive days. They will also be asked to complete a 24-h diet recall questionnaire. During week 1, participants will be invited to a group education session limited to up to 10 participants per group. Participants will be asked to return the accelerometer device during the group session. The research assistants will note down the recruitment rate, intervention uptake, and any reasons for refusal to take up the intervention. Week 2 of the intervention will consist of individual household visits to provide participants with physical activity and diet education based on set goals and to provide printed pamphlet of the education components. The research assistants will telephone the participants weekly for monitoring support and motivation. On week 10, the research assistants will conduct household visits and reassess all baseline measurements. Participants will be asked to wear the acceleromer for 7 days as a post-intervention measure. Adherence rate, completion rate, follow-up rate, and fidelity will be assessed. An exit interview will be conducted to assess intervention acceptability.

Table 4 Scope and sequence of the intervention

Self-monitoring support

Due to reported low literacy levels in the HAALSI cohort [26, 37], self-monitoring support which does not require the participants to read or write will be provided. The trained research assistants will telephone each participant once weekly to ask questions about the participant’s identified physical activity and dietary goals. The research assistant will have a copy of each participant’s printed intervention and record progress. Participants will be asked to provide personal and alternative contact number. Where a participant cannot to be reached via telephone, a household visit will be conducted. The self-monitoring support is also noted as an active behaviour change technique due to its ability to enhance motivation of adhering to an intervention [35].

Outcomes and criteria for success

In line with the primary objective (c) of the study, the criteria adapted for judging the feasibility of progressing to a larger-scale evaluation (Table 5) were initially developed by Avery and colleagues’ [38] top Ten tips for guiding the decision to progress from a pilot to a definitive trial and later reproduced by Hynes and colleague [39]. The criteria were also discussed by the study authors guided by existing literature.

Table 5 HYPHEN progression criteria

Primary feasibility outcome measures

For primary objective a of the study, nine focus-group discussions were conducted as part of the needs analysis process, and the outcome is presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. For primary objective b of the study, we followed a model of behaviour change as outlined in Fig. 1, and the outcomes are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. Primary objective c will be assessed as per Table 5.

The feasibility study parameters which will be used to inform the design of a larger HYPHEN intervention trial are outlined in Table 4. Demographic data (age, sex, employment status, type of employment) of participants who refuse to participate in the intervention will be recorded as well as their reasons for refusal. Acceptability of the intervention will be assessed using an in-depth semi-structured interviews through a self-developed interview guide. All participants who were recruited will be invited for the interviews including those who did not complete the intervention. The interview topics and questions will focus on predetermined themes of participants’ perceived expectations of the intervention, benefits, motivations, and barriers. These topics will be explored in relation to participants age, sex, and employment status. Participants will also be asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the intervention using a Likert scale [40]. Fidelity of intervention delivery will be assessed by the primary author to ascertain whether the field workers provided the intervention as intended using a checklist framed around the intended BCTs (Table 6).

Table 6 Fidelity of delivery of intervention

Secondary outcome measures

Secondary outcomes which will be assessed are outlined in Table 7 and are as follows: (i) Blood pressure will be measured using a oscillometry blood pressure monitor, (ii) body mass index will be measured using a stadiometer and a portable LED weighing scale, (iii) waist-hip ratio will be measured using a rubber tape measure, (iv) urinary sodium will be measured by collecting participants urine sample, (v) physical activity will be measured using an Axivity AX3 wearable device on the wrist, and (vi) diet will be assessed using a 24-h diet recall questionnaire.

Table 7 Secondary outcome measure outline

Data and statistical analysis

Quantitative analysis

A Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flowchart will be used to present the flow of participants throughout the intervention. The CONSORT flowchart will also present reasons for declining participation or withdrawing. Descriptive statistics will be used to present baseline statistics and outcomes of feasibility. Depending on data distribution, mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range will be described. Pre- and post-intervention outcome change will be assessed using a paired t-test if data is evenly distributed. If data is unevenly distributed, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used. Confidence interval is set at 95%.

Qualitative analysis

The interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s approach to thematic analysis [46]. An independent transcriber will be employed to perform the transcription, the first author will perform the initial codes and themes, and the co-authors will confirm the generated codes and themes. Data will be described narratively. Participants’ direct quotations will be provided and will be used to judge whether the participants perceive the intervention to be acceptable. Positive responses from the participants will indicate acceptability (Table 5).

Patient and public involvement

In the needs assessment prior to intervention design, stakeholder engagements were undertaken with hypertensive adults exploring their perceptions of sociocultural influences on diet and physical activity. Hypertensive adults were also consulted on their perceived intervention needs and preferred educational approaches before designing the intervention. Local dieticians were consulted about current approaches to hypertension control and learning points from community-based interventions. Community members/the public were also consulted for social issues that are likely to enhance/inhibit success of the intervention. The findings from the various engagements led to the development of the 10-week intervention. The involvement of local research assistants was an important aspect to consider overcoming any trust and cultural issues involved.

Discussion

In this study, we will seek to implement and then test the feasibility of a community-based intervention for hypertensive adults that incorporate the patient’s perceptions about their social and cultural beliefs regarding physical activity and dietary practices. This study may lead to recommendations that will assist in the control of high blood pressure particularly for adults in a rural South African or similar population. The results from this study may provide a novel contribution to the understanding of contextual factors about physical activity, diet, and implementation of interventions for a rural, South African adult population. Data generated from this study will inform the design and implementation of a larger-scale intervention of HYPHEN, if appropriate.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

NCD:

Noncommunicable disease

BCT:

Behaviour change technique

CONSORT:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

HDSS:

Health and demographic surveillance system

HREC:

Human Research Ethics Committee

IM:

Intervention mapping

References

  1. Alwan A. For the World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

  2. Zhou B, Bentham J, Di Cesare M, Bixby H, Danaei G, Cowan MJ, et al. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19· 1 million participants. The Lancet. 2017;389(10064):37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ntuli ST, Maimela E, Alberts M, Choma S, Dikotope S. Prevalence and associated risk factors of hypertension amongst adults in a rural community of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015;7:847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zihindulai G, MacGregor RG, Ross AJ. A rural scholarship model addressing the shortage of healthcare workers in rural areas. S Afr Health Rev. 2018;2018(1):51–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sekome K. Perceptions on and quality of clinical practice guidelines for stroke management in a rural health district. S Afr Health Rev. 2018;2018(1):109–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rispel LC, Ditlopo P, White JA, Blaauw D. Socio-economic characteristics and career intentions of the WiSDOM health professional cohort in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertram MY, Tollman S, Hofman KJ, Steyn K, Wentzel-Viljoen E. Reducing the sodium content of high-salt foods: effect on cardiovascular disease in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2012;102(9):743–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. He FJ, Li J, MacGregor GA. Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Bmj. 2013;346:f1325.

  9. Lin JS, O’Connor EA, Evans C V, Senger CA, Rowland MG, Groom HC. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthy lifestyle for cardiovascular disease prevention in persons with cardiovascular risk factors: an updated systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oyeyemi AL, Moss SJ, Monyeki MA, Kruger HS. Measurement of physical activity in urban and rural South African adults: a comparison of two self-report methods. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smart Mabweazara Z, Lloyd Leach L, Smith M, Tsolekile L, Puoane T. Ellisras Longitudinal Study 2017: patterns of physical activity in an urban and rural setting among black South African adults (ELS 23). Cardiovasc J Afr. 2019;30(5):262–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomaz SA, Davies JI, Micklesfield LK, Wade AN, Kahn K, Tollman SM, et al. Self-reported physical activity in middle-aged and older adults in rural South Africa: levels and correlates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6325.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Charlton KE, Steyn K, Levitt NS, Peer N, Jonathan D, Gogela T, et al. A food-based dietary strategy lowers blood pressure in a low socio-economic setting: a randomised study in South Africa. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11(12):1397–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geza W, Ngidi MSC, Slotow R, Mabhaudhi T. The dynamics of youth employment and empowerment in agriculture and rural development in South Africa: a scoping review. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):5041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Najam W, Walsh C, Oldewage-Theron W. Nutrition knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices: a comparison of urban and rural adults in the Free State province of South Africa. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2023;36(4):154–61.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cook I. Physical activity in rural South Africa-are current surveillance instruments yielding valid results? S Afr Med J. 2007;97(11):1072–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gómez-Olivé FX, Montana L, Wagner RG, Kabudula CW, Rohr JK, Kahn K, et al. Cohort profile: health and ageing in Africa: a longitudinal study of an indepth community in South Africa (HAALSI). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(3):689–690j.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE, Buiten E, Bird N. The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. For Policy Econ. 2007;9(5):558–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Faber M, Wenhold F. Food intake and sources of food of poor households in rural areas of South Africa. Water use and nutrient content of crop and animal food products for improved household food security: a scoping study WRC Report no TT. 2012;537(12):24–57.

  20. Temple NJ, Steyn NP, Fourie J, De Villiers A. Price and availability of healthy food: a study in rural South Africa. Nutrition. 2011;27(1):55–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Intervention mapping: designing theory-and evidence-based health promotion programs. Mayfield Mountain View, CA: Mayfield publishing; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brug J, Oenema A, Ferreira I. Theory, evidence and intervention mapping to improve behavior nutrition and physical activity interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorogood M, Goudge J, Bertram M, Chirwa T, Eldridge S, Gómez-Olivé FX, et al. The Nkateko health service trial to improve hypertension management in rural South Africa: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jardim TV, Reiger S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Gomez-Olive FX, Wagner RG, Wade A, et al. Hypertension management in a population of older adults in rural South Africa. J Hypertens. 2017;35(6):1283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Goudge J, Chirwa T, Eldridge S, Gómez-Olivé FXF, Kabudula C, Limbani F, et al. Can lay health workers support the management of hypertension? Findings of a cluster randomised trial in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000577.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gomez-Olive FX, Montana L, Wagner RG, Kabudula CW, Rohr JK, Kahn K, et al. Cohort profile: health and ageing in Africa: a longitudinal study of an indepth community in South Africa (HAALSI). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(3):689–690j.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tickle-Degnen L. Nuts and bolts of conducting feasibility studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(2):171–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mailhot T, Goulet MH, Maheu-Cadotte MA, Fontaine G, Lequin P, Lavoie P. Methodological reporting in feasibility studies: a descriptive review of the nursing intervention research literature. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(5):460–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. In: Understanding and changing health behaviour. London: Psychology Press; 2013. p. 299–339.

  34. Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman Springer; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Michie S, Hyder N, Walia A, West R. Development of a taxonomy of behaviour change techniques used in individual behavioural support for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2011;36(4):315–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abrahams-Gessel S, Gómez-Olivé FX, Tollman S, Wade AN, Du Toit JD, Ferro EG, et al. Improvements in hypertension control in the rural longitudinal HAALSI cohort of South African adults aged 40 and older, from 2014 to 2019. Am J Hypertens. 2023;36(6):324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Avery KNL, Williamson PR, Gamble C, Francischetto EO, Metcalfe C, Davidson P, et al. Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hynes L, Murphy AW, Hart N, Kirwan C, Mulligan S, Leathem C, et al. The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: a protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022;8(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal DK. Likert scale: explored and explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7(4):396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Carey RM, Whelton PK, Committee* 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline Writing. Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(5):351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lyznicki JM, Young DC, Riggs JA, Davis RM. Obesity: assessment and management in primary care. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(11):2185–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dalton M, Cameron AJ, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE, Jolley D, Dunstan DW, et al. Waist circumference, waist–hip ratio and body mass index and their correlation with cardiovascular disease risk factors in Australian adults. J Intern Med. 2003;254(6):555–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vereecken CA, Covents M, Sichert-Hellert W, Alvira JMF, Le Donne C, De Henauw S, et al. Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe. Int J Obes. 2008;32(5):S26-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Braun V, ClarkeV, Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ, editors. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Research Designs, vol. 2. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2012. pp. 57–71. 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Agincourt HDSS for allowing the study to access information through their surveillance system.

Funding

This research was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No. G-19–57145), Sida (Grant No.: 54100113), Uppsala Monitoring Center, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD), and by the Wellcome Trust [reference no. 107768/Z/15/Z] and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, with support from the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training, and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa) programme. The research is also supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) Thuthuka (Grant No.: 129864). The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the fellow. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have participated in the design of the study. KS drafted the manuscript, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript. KS applied for and obtained the grants for the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kganetso Sekome.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study required clearance from two ethical bodies. The first clearance was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC-Medical) (clearance number: M 210282). The second clearance was obtained from the local Provincial Department of Health Research and Ethics Committee (clearance number: MP_202106_001). Consent considerations and confidentiality of all research data will be adhered to. This study is based on the usual ethical principles, such as every person’s right to refuse to participate in the study and to withdraw at any time, as well as respect for all participants and protection of their privacy.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekome, K., Gómez-Olivé, F.X., Sherar, L.B. et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a contextualized physical activity and diet intervention for the control of hypertension in adults from a rural subdistrict: a study protocol (HYPHEN). Pilot Feasibility Stud 10, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01456-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-024-01456-w

Keywords