Skip to main content
Download PDF

“My Body, My Rhythm, My Voice”: a community dance pilot intervention engaging breast cancer survivors in physical activity in a middle-income country

Pilot and Feasibility Studies volume 9, Article number: 30 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Interventions to promote physical activity among women breast cancer survivors (BCS) in low- to middle-income countries are limited. We assessed the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a theory-driven, group-based dance intervention for BCS delivered in Bogotá, Colombia.

Methods

We conducted a quasi-experimental study employing a mixed-methods approach to assess the 8-week, 3 times/week group dance intervention. The effect of the intervention on participants’ physical activity levels (measured by accelerometry), motivation to engage in physical activity, and quality of life were evaluated using generalized estimating equation analysis. The qualitative method included semi-structured interviews thematically analyzed to evaluate program acceptability.

Results

Sixty-four BCS were allocated to the intervention (n = 31) or the control groups (n = 33). In the intervention arm, 84% attended ≥ 60% of sessions. We found increases on average minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day (intervention: +8.99 vs control: −3.7 min), and in ratings of motivation (intervention change score = 0.45, vs. control change score= −0.05). BCS reported improvements in perceived behavioral capabilities to be active, captured through the interviews.

Conclusions

The high attendance, behavioral changes, and successful delivery indicate the potential effectiveness, feasibility, and scalability of the intervention for BCS in Colombia.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05252780, registered on Dec 7th, 2021—retrospectively registered unique protocol ID: P20CA217199-9492018.

Peer Review reports

Key messages regarding feasibility

  • What uncertainties existed regarding the feasibility?

    There is uncertainty about the implementation of a dance-based intervention to promote physical activity among breast cancer survivors (BCS) in a community setting in Colombia, as well as the assessment of the acceptability and effectiveness through a mixed-methods study.

  • What are the key feasibility findings?

    The proposed intervention was successfully delivered and assessed, showing high attendance, acceptability, and behavioral changes.

  • What are the implications of the feasibility findings for the design of the main study?

    The feasibility findings are promising to promote the systematic uptake and evaluation of My Body theory-driven intervention for breast cancer survivors in the community setting in Colombia.

Background

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide [1]. In Latin America, breast cancer incidence has been rising in most countries over the last decade, increasing between 2012 and 2018 from 52.1 to 56.8 new cases per 100,000 women [2, 3]. In Colombia, during the period 2011–2018, the breast cancer incidence rate increased from 33.8 to 44.1 cases per 100,000 women, and the mortality rate increased from 9.9 to 11.9 deaths per 100,000 women [4, 5]. Furthermore, the 5-year net survival for women diagnosed with breast cancer decreased in Colombia from 79.1% in 2005 to 72.2% for the women diagnosed during the 2010–2014 period [6].

A large body of evidence supports the beneficial effects of physical activity for breast cancer survivors (BCS), including improvements in survival, physical functioning, psychological complaints, and overall quality of life (QoL) [7, 8]. Worldwide evidence-based exercise guidance for cancer survivors recommends daily physical activity, as it contributes to reductions in body fat, metabolic and sex hormones, growth factors, and inflammation, as well as broader biopsychosocial outcomes (i.e., it reduces symptoms of depression/anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, and improves well-being) [9, 10]. However, many BCS are not meeting the physical activity recommendations [11]. Evidence from high-income countries shows low physical activity participation and more likelihood to engage in sedentary behavior among BCS [12, 13]. Among Colombian BCS, low physical activity levels have also been reported [14]; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are no prevalence estimates of physical activity among BCS in Colombia. We know that 57% of Colombian adult women do not meet the current guidelines [15], and the most reported barriers to regular physical activity for Colombian women include time management, caregiving roles, safety concerns, and inadequate recreational facilities [16, 17].

The challenge of adhering to an active lifestyle has led to the development and assessment of theory-driven interventions promoting physical activity tailored for BCS as a way to help individuals adopt and maintain healthy behaviors [18]. Thus far, physical activity programs tailored to the needs and preferences of BCS have been lacking in Latin America, a region characterized by a disproportionately lower prevalence of physical activity among women compared to men [19]. Behavioral interventions undertaken in the USA and other high-income countries have achieved increases in physical activity levels in BCS using diverse cognitive-behavioral techniques [20, 21]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 interventions designed to promote physical activity behavior change in cancer survivors concluded that interventions with more intense supervision (i.e., in-person, frequent interactions) tended to produce larger effects on behavior change [22], and “action planning,” “graded tasks,” and “social support” were identified as promising intervention components that facilitated behavior change [22]. In addition, qualitative studies evaluating elements of program adherence success among interventions targeting BCS have underscored the group-based environment, which can facilitate social support and camaraderie of others [23] in addition to physical activity and emotional modeling that facilitates positive psychosocial well-being [24]. Group-based interventions targeting BCS have been developed mainly in high-income countries [25], suggesting its potential in regions like Latin America, where social support and other interpersonal processes have been positively related to initiating and maintaining physical activity among women [26, 27].

From an ecological perspective, behavioral interventions, in addition to targeting individuals, should also affect interpersonal, organizational, and environmental factors influencing health behavior, while addressing the question of how practitioners can best integrate theory into large-scale public health programs. Colombia is an international leader in developing innovative, publicly funded, community-based physical activity programs, some of which have been in place for more than 20 years [28], and are now being implemented in other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as well as higher income nations. These group-based physical activity programs have shown promise in promoting physical activity among Latin American women by incorporating dance in guided sessions [29]. However, the role of health behavior theories in the ongoing programs has not been clear or has been secondary to practical concerns. In this context, a relevant next step is to design a theory-driven intervention to promote physical activity among Colombian BCS by leveraging the existing community-based approach. A culturally tailored, group-based dance intervention to promote physical activity is one approach that appears to be feasible, acceptable, and potentially effective to increase physical activity in Latin America, as dance is a well-known motivating form of physical activity [30, 31].

The aim of the “My body, My Rhythm, My Voice” (from now on referred to as My Body) pilot study was to assess the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a theory-driven, group-based dance intervention for BCS delivered by a governmental entity in Bogotá, Colombia. Using a mixed methods approach, we aimed to (1) assess the individual-level primary outcomes for this pilot including physical activity levels, QoL, and motivation to engage in physical activity and (2) assess the acceptability of the program from a socioecological perspective, including semi-structured interviews inquiring about barriers and facilitators at the individual, interpersonal, and community levels. This study is innovative in that, to our knowledge, it is the first to pilot-test a theory-driven community-based physical activity program for BCS in Latin America. The research was conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Study setting

In Colombia, a middle-income country [32], public institutions from the healthcare and sports/recreation sectors offer community-based programs aimed at physical activity promotion using a life-course approach [28, 33]. In addition, breast cancer-related stakeholders offer diverse activities as private initiatives to increase BCS’s quality of life. In the My Body study, we facilitated cross-sectoral partnerships between local entities to implement an 8-week evidence-based behavioral physical activity program for BCS using a community-based dance intervention. The municipal Recreovía dance-based physical activity program [29], publicly funded by Bogotá’s Sports and Recreation Institute, was in charge of My Body program delivery.

Study design

The study piloted a two-armed, quasi-experimental trial comparing an intervention to a usual care control arm. This pilot study employed a convergent mixed-methods approach [34] to integrate pre- and post-quantitative and qualitative data methods. The quantitative methods included pre-test–post-test assessments. The qualitative methods included pre- and post-intervention semi-structured interviews with both intervention and control arms to understand facilitators and barriers to program acceptability. We summarized the quantitative and qualitative results in a table to gain a more thorough understanding of contextual factors that could influence the intervention outcomes. All participants signed informed consent, and the study was approved by the Universidad de los Andes ethics committee, Act Number 949 of 2018.

The “My Body, My Rhythm, My Voice” physical activity behavioral intervention

Following a socioecological approach to promote physical activity behavior change, My Body was co-created through cross-sector collaboration among academic researchers and stakeholders from local and national public and private healthcare and sports/recreation institutions, healthcare service providers, and community organizations supporting cancer survivors. Members of the interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral research team (e.g., physiotherapist, epidemiologist, psychologist, respiratory therapist, physician, anthropologist) had monthly meetings (N = 8). Methodological details concerning the co-creation have been reported elsewhere [35]. Based on the discussions and a systematic review of the literature, we designed the 8-week, 3 times/week dancing-based physical activity intervention, mostly informed by the social cognitive and self-determination theories [36, 37]. The goal of the intervention was to gradually increase all participants’ physical activity levels to achieve significant health benefits. For this reason, the set of strategies to facilitate behavior change was deployed progressively, week by week, through the interaction of the dance-based physical activity sessions and a psychoeducational booklet designed for BCS, described as follows (online resource 1).

According to the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine for cancer patients [9], physical activity intensity increases were progressive and moderate. Sessions were 45 min initially, followed by 5-min increases per week, until reaching 60 min by the fifth week, plus 10-min warm-up and 10-min cool-down activities. Physical activity intensity increases were determined using maximum heart rate (HR) based on reference equations for BCS and considering the relationship between the expected exercise HR and the speed of a given song accompanying the group dance movements [38]. Based on these determinations, the playlist music was selected according to each song’s tempo (beats per minute [BPM]) and expected HR to maintain a comfortable level of exertion during the exercise [39]. Including culturally relevant dancing rhythms such as salsa and champeta, the music BPM progressively increased as shown in online resource 1. The instructors had been previously certified in dancing-based physical activity instruction by the Recreovía program. Participants were encouraged to invite their caregivers or another supportive person to attend the physical activity sessions with them.

The behavioral science research team members designed a psychoeducational booklet for BCS containing activities to foster behavior change (e.g., goal setting, action planning, enhancing decisional balance for being active, self-monitoring) [22, 36, 37]. The psychoeducational booklet was given to participants at the beginning of the intervention, and once per week, a researcher attended the session to follow up and guide participants’ use of the booklet and to provide motivational and behavioral instruction and support (online resource 1). The booklet was also used to train the physical activity instructors on behavior change strategies. As part of the physical activity intervention, the participants were taught by their instructor during each class how to utilize behavioral and cognitive self-regulatory skills to increase and maintain their physical activity participation (e.g., action planning, coping planning, counter conditioning, self-evaluation).

No specific instructions were given to the usual care group concerning physical activity behavior change beyond any given by their health care providers.

Recruitment of breast cancer survivors

An a priori sample size of 30 participants per study group was based primarily on logistical and budgetary constraints for the pilot study. BCS were invited to the study through word of mouth, flyers, and social media from partner organizations. Eligible women were BCS at least 6 months post-treatment completion, more than 18 years of age, living in Bogotá, and willing to attend the program and the assessments. To enhance diversity in this first-generation study, individuals were eligible irrespective of whether they were currently meeting physical activity guidelines or not. Exclusion criteria were the presence of metastatic disease and other health conditions for which community physical activity was contraindicated. Medical clearance for participation provided by sports medicine physicians, who were members of the research team, was required. Women who did not receive physician approval were not included in the study. Given the need to respect partner organizations’ concerns about providing differential interventions to their patients through randomization, the first half of the participants with physician approval was allocated to the intervention group, while the second half was allocated to a waitlist control group. Participants in the intervention group received modest incentives in sessions 1, 12, and 24 (e.g., a water bottle, sun cap, drawstring bag), as well as a small financial remuneration for transportation to each attended community session (equalling approximately $1.25 USD per session). Participants in the control group received the physical activity intervention at the end of the 8-week study period after completing the pre-post-study assessments. Due to time and funding constraints, no outcome measurements were collected for the waitlist control group when they received their program.

Quantitative assessment

Trained personnel evaluated participants at Universidad de los Andes’ campus facilities and at the intervention location, which was a residential community center, administered by Bogotá’s Sports and Recreation Institute. We collected accelerometry measurements, as well as self-reported questionnaires, that captured sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and QoL (all described below). All measurements were performed at baseline (time 0) and at 8 weeks (time 1, i.e., immediately post-intervention).

Outcome variables

Physical activity levels/accelerometry

To assess participants’ physical activity levels, participants wore the Actigraph GT3X or GT3X+ Accelerometers (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, USA) for 7 consecutive days from awakening to bedtime using an elasticized belt around the waist at the right mid-axillary line. The accelerometer was removed when bathing or sleeping. For wear-time validation, a minimum of 4 weekdays and a weekend day with at least 10 h of wear during the waking time was required. Accelerometers were initialized to collect data at a sampling frequency of 80 Hz, downloaded in 1-s epochs, and grouped in 60-s epochs for analysis. After the data collection, we validated the time of use with an algorithm programmed in R (version 3.3.2). The data were scored using the Freedson cut-points for adults [40].

Additionally, to measure physical activity levels during dancing sessions, two participants, randomly selected during each session, wore an accelerometer with an elasticized belt around the waist at the right mid-axillary line.

Motivation to engage in physical activity

Self-determination theory (SDT) conceptualizes motivation as a continuum ranging from amotivation (complete lack of self-determination to perform the behavior) to a high level of intrinsic motivation (high self-determination, the behavior is driven by enjoyment) [37, 41, 42]. As part of this continuum, extrinsic motivation is differentiated as four regulatory processes that range in level of internalization and self-determination (external, introjected, identified, integrated regulation) [42]. To assess motivational regulation for physical activity, we used the validated Spanish version of the Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 (BREQ-3) [43], a 23-item inventory assessing the above SDT-relevant constructs. Responses to each item were reported on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not true for me) to 4 (very true for me).

Quality of life

To assess health-related QoL, we used the official Colombian Spanish translation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) [44]. It incorporates five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning), three symptom subscales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), six single symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), an item for illness-related financial difficulties, and a two-item general health/global QoL subscale. Each item was reported on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much), except for the general health subscale, for which response options range from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All the scores are transformed into the range of 0–100. High scores on the functioning subscales and the global health status/QoL subscale represent higher QoL, while high scores on the symptom subscales indicate high levels of symptomatology, hence, poorer QoL. We also used a subscale of the EORTC questionnaire specific to breast cancer patients regarding physical symptoms of lymphedema; it comprises seven items with responses also ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). We followed the questionnaire manuals to perform statistical analyses and compared results to normative values for the Colombian population [44].

Sociodemographic characteristics

We collected surveys inquiring about sociodemographic variables including age, education, socioeconomic level, employment status, and healthcare access.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, absolute frequency, and percentage) were calculated for each outcome variable at baseline and post-intervention. To characterize the population, we compared the intervention with the control group on sociodemographics at baseline using independent t test or chi-square procedures depending on the nature and distribution of the variable. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) with non-structure correlation were used to analyze changes in primary behavioral outcomes (e.g., physical activity levels) and secondary behavioral outcomes (e.g., motivation to engage in physical activity), and QoL across the intervention period occurring within subjects. GEE was used for its ability to provide a population-averaged effect from repeatedly measured data of multiple subjects in absence of normality. A coefficient interaction between the time of observation and the presence/absence of intervention and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the possible effects of the intervention in this population. Stata®, version 16.0, and R Core Team, version 4.0, were used to analyze the data.

Acceptability assessment: interviews

Women in the intervention and control groups participated in the baseline interviews, while only the intervention group participated in follow-up interviews pertaining to the acceptability of the intervention (total interviews = 37). We used a semi-structured interviewing technique to ensure in-depth insights about BCS perspectives towards physical activity, their anticipated and actual experienced barriers and facilitators to engage in the physical activity intervention, their expected and reported benefits from the physical activity intervention, and the perceived positive and negative aspects of the program.

A social scientist on the study team (MAR) led the interviews, which had an average participation of three BCS and 18-min duration each. Interviews were conducted in small groups, given the purpose of generating collective insights regarding program acceptability. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using Excel thematic matrices (Microsoft Corporation, 2018). Four researchers, who were separate from the interview facilitator, independently conducted the analysis. The total number of transcripts was divided in two, and each half was duplicated and analyzed by two researchers. Transcripts were thematically analyzed according to the socioecological model [45] using the following categories and subthemes: perceived barriers to engage in the intervention (intrapersonal, interpersonal, community level), perceived facilitators (intrapersonal, interpersonal, community level), perceived benefits (physical, mental, and social), and program recommendations. Researchers participated in weekly meetings to discuss interpretations and resolve discrepancies.

Results

Study recruitment and attrition

The participants were recruited from March 2019 to September 2019 (Fig. 1). The combined recruitment efforts with partner organizations yielded 685 BCS eligible to participate in the study. Of this pool of individuals, 553 BCS were excluded because they declined or were not interested in participating, or were unreachable by phone. For the remaining eligible participants (n = 132), telephone screens were completed to determine study eligibility. For eligible participants, an appointment was made with a project sports medicine physician to obtain medical clearance for participation in the program. Of those who were eligible, 87 attended the medical evaluation. After receiving the medical evaluation, 24 BCS were excluded because the project physician did not approve of their participation in the study or because the individuals subsequently decided not to participate for personal reasons (including not being able to commit to the study or not being interested). After consent was obtained, the 64 eligible and consenting participants were allocated to the two study arms, achieving a sample size of 33 participants in the control group and 31 participants in the intervention group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort flow diagram of “My body, My Rhythm, My Voice” study population

Full size image

Attrition after study enrolment was 15.6% overall (10/64), with six and four participants not completing follow-up in the intervention and control groups, respectively, owing to medical treatments (e.g., eye surgery) (n = 3), relocations (n = 2), or beginning a new job (n = 5). All participants with complete data from the pre- and post-intervention measurements were included in the analyses; thus, the final analytic sample included 25 participants in the intervention group and 29 participants in the control group. Regarding physical activity class attendance rates, 84% of the intervention group attended ≥ 60% of the sessions (15 or more of the 24 sessions). Twenty-five percent of women had family members and friends join at least one session.

Sociodemographic characteristics

Study participants were primarily educated women (most of them [62.5%] had completed high school or higher education programs), with a mean age of 56.4 years (SD ± 9.5). Half of them were single (50%), and participant households were more likely to be in the middle socioeconomic stratum (62.5%) as opposed to higher (0%) or lower (37.5%) socioeconomic strata. Most of the women (60.9%) were not formally employed, although a large percentage of them worked as caregivers or housekeepers (60.0%). Most of the women received healthcare services through self-paid insurance plans (contributive regimens) (78.1%). When examining the participant’s history of cancer, the average time since cancer diagnosis was 6.4 years (± 5.6). Women from the intervention and control groups did not differ significantly on any of the variables measured at baseline (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline individual characteristics by group from the “My body, My Rhythm, My Voice” study
Full size table

My Body intervention effects

Changes in physical activity levels using accelerometry

From baseline to 8-week post-test, significant improvements were noted in average minutes of accelerometry-derived moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day for the intervention versus the control group (+8.99 vs −3.71 min) (Table 2). Based on the subsample of women randomly chosen to wear accelerometers during physical activity sessions, women in the intervention group were recorded as having an average of 13.47 MVPA minutes per session. Online resource 2 shows MVPA records for the physical activity intervention sessions.

Table 2 Evaluated outcomes by group from the study My body, My Rhythm, My Voice
Full size table

Motivation to engage in physical activity

Significant between-group increases were noted for intrinsic motivation for exercise (0.45 vs −0.05) and for identified regulation (i.e., high self-determination, the behavior is executed because it is enjoyable and of interest to the individual) (0.27 vs −0.03) for the intervention versus the control group (Table 2).

Quality of life

The results of the EORTC QLQ-C30 did not show a change in the global score (Table 2). However, there are some specific positive results comparing changes between groups. For the physical functioning subscale scores (+2.67 vs −2.53) and insomnia (−12.00 vs 3.45), the change between the intervention versus control group was statistically significant. Additionally, although statistically non-significant, the intervention group also showed an important difference in gastrointestinal function. Compared with the control group, the intervention group had fewer diarrhea (−6.67 vs 3.45) and constipation (1.33 vs −4.60) complaints. These results indicate a pattern in some symptoms towards higher QoL among the intervention versus the control group. Adjust effect for pain and dyspnea could not be estimated due to changes were not found.

My Body program acceptability

Barriers and facilitators to engage in physical activity program

Table 3 provides details of the reported barriers (i.e., time management, limited self-efficacy, limited social support) and facilitators (i.e., enjoyment, resilience skills, peer care network) to engage in the My Body program. Of note, in addition to identifying barriers, BCS mentioned having used the following motivational coping strategies: (1) focusing on positive attitudes towards self-care that allow them to satisfy their own needs for enjoyment and personal time and being aware of the benefits of prioritizing their own well-being; (2) using available personal, family, and social resources such as better time management, making agreements with family members to distribute tasks, and speaking to employers to make their working hours flexible so that they could regularly participate in the program; and (3) developing home-based alternatives by recording sessions and sharing videos to practice at home.

Table 3 Reported barriers, facilitators, and benefits of My Body physical activity program
Full size table

Perceived benefits of the program

According to the BCS, My Body enabled positive changes in their perceptions of physical activity. A number acknowledged that, instead of causing discomfort, exercise creates wellness. Some of the women described how they had believed that daily tasks and housekeeping chores provided a sufficient physical activity to maintain optimal health. They reported that through engaging in the My Body program they viewed physical activity during leisure time as a pleasant habit of personal enjoyment, which can be better maintained using the self-regulation skills that they were taught as part of the physical activity program.

Benefits primarily reported by BCS as part of the semi-structured interviews were related to a better perception and management of their body and rising awareness and control over their movements and capabilities (Table 3). Some participants who said that they tended to feel isolated, highlighted improvements in their social skills and connectedness. They described a shift from relating to their bodies from a place of fear, to feeling capable and comfortable in their bodies. The program enabled positive attitudes (e.g., discipline, personal agency, self-confidence) and improved self-image and mood, and motivation to leave home. In general, the narratives of the participants indicated that the physical activity dance sessions enabled changes in their self-belief systems, which contributed to the strengthening of the following outcomes: (1) self-care, by acquiring a space for personal enjoyment; (2) self-efficacy, by feeling capable of generating changes in important health behaviors; (3) self-esteem, by generating a sense of worth and pride, and celebrating their own achievements; and (4) self-concept, by recognizing their own physical, psychological, and social capacities, and valuing positive behaviors such as personal coping strategies and empathy towards others.

Program recommendations

During the post-program interviews, the intervention women underscored the following areas as successful aspects of the program: (1) the professionals implementing it (instructors, members of the research team), as they encouraged participants within a context of worth and trust; (2) the sessions, which were perceived as innovative, attractive, challenging, and fun; (3) practicing physical activity with peers, as they could identify with each other’s experiences and provide/receive support; (4) being able to invite family members and friends to join the program sessions and share a fun space; and (5) the communication channels created between the research team and the participants, such as WhatsApp, which generated a feeling of worth and allowed access to recorded videos of the sessions. Regarding suggested program improvements, a few participants mentioned the location was too far from their home, some said the time schedule was inconvenient for people with working schedules, and some expressed the nutrition workshops should include practical sessions such as recipe preparation. Also, some BCS expressed willingness to perform as physical activity promotors whether disseminating the program with other BCS or facilitating its implementation in other cities, using their word of mouth to communicate experienced benefits. Table 4 summarizes issues and lessons learned about the intervention by triangulating quantitative and qualitative results.

Table 4 Integration of quantitative and qualitative results from the study My body, My Rhythm, My Voice
Full size table

Discussion

My Body, a theory-driven and dance-based physical activity program for BCS, has the potential of being effective for increasing physical activity and improving quality of life by using a community setting approach. The intervention group was able to add ~10 min of MVPA per day (i.e., ~70 min/week) in response to the intervention. Physical activity has been linked with a variety of positive health outcomes in adults, including women who are survivors of breast cancer [10, 46]. Importantly, we observed an increase in intrinsic regulation for physical activity, reflecting the fact that women became increasingly motivated to participate in regular physical activity based on the benefits that it could bring to them personally. Regarding QoL, we observed improvements in the scores for physical functioning and insomnia symptoms—two key outcomes for BCS. Additionally, through the post-intervention interviews, women reported broad perceived benefits contributing to well-being enhancement. The cancer-specific focus of the program, their enjoyment of the reasonably moderate physical activity intensity, and the encouraging program environment are positive features that could be maintained in the My Body program. Lastly, adherence to the program was high. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in Latin America to engage a transdisciplinary community-setting approach to implement a safe, accessible, and culturally appropriate program to affect the general wellness of BCS. While the study was conducted prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, participants also appreciated the availability of recorded sessions, with remote platforms such as Facebook and YouTube serving as additional methods for delivering portions of the program during times when in-person gatherings are limited.

In the last few years, several studies in high-income countries (HIC) have reported the effects of dance-based physical activity interventions on BCS, reporting promising improvements in physical, mental, and social health [47, 48]. Given this, this research area can benefit at this juncture from the delivery and evaluation of effective intervention protocols at a community level [49]. My Body was effectively delivered as part of a publicly available municipal physical activity program offered by the city of Bogotá. Future larger-scale studies involving randomization or crossover designs with larger periods of intervention and evaluation could provide evidence of program effects on additional important outcomes for this population. Furthermore, follow-up of a longer duration could address the question of sustainability.

Across different cultures, dancing has been indicated as providing an optimal balance between an effective as well as engaging training protocol for women, including those with a breast cancer diagnosis [48]. This was reflected in the self-regulation for physical activity increases, particularly, significant increases for intrinsic motivation and identified regulation which, according to self-determination theory, are associated with adherence to regular active behaviors [42, 50]. These results suggest that participants were no longer exercising simply for extrinsic reasons but developed a more personal interest in physical activity, finding it enjoyable and beneficial [41]. Women expressed interest in replicating active behaviors by dancing along with videos at home and noting interest in becoming champions for physical activity among BCS more generally. Additionally, BCS underscored the peer care network as a facilitator for engaging in the intervention, which generated feelings of comfort and confidence, and enabled emotional support and role modeling to support one’s own goals and dissipate personal fears. Overall, participants expressed that group-based cancer-specific physical activity encouraged a sense of belonging, worth, mutual support, and emotional bonding [51].

In terms of cancer survivors’ QoL, a growing body of literature has indicated that tumor-related peer support groups enhance a long-term development of positive QoL and coping [51,52,53]. Future studies should involve larger samples and longer evaluation periods to potentially capture additional changes in other symptoms and dimensions of QoL.

Analyzing participant narratives allowed for a qualitative process evaluation of changes in women’s perceptions about physical activity. Women reported that they gained confidence in their competence to perform physical activity as a possible additional activity to daily tasks and found it to be increasingly relevant to personal enjoyment, self-care, and well-being enhancement. Such improvements in participant attitudes indicate the potential of My Body to improve perceived behavioral capabilities to be active.

Overall, participants were satisfied with the program while identifying facilitators and barriers that align with findings obtained in similar studies [52, 53]. Facilitators of program attendance included enjoyment of dance sessions, increased social support, and motivated and knowledgeable staff. The main reported barriers to regular attendance were medical schedules (as patients and caregivers) and limited social support among family. Some participants missed sessions due to medical appointments, underscoring that the lack of physical activity programs offered within the health care system is a community-level barrier. If physical activity promotion was part of their oncological treatment, then the overlap between medical appointments and activity sessions could potentially be more readily diminished.

Future studies should include virtual sessions that could improve adherence. Women stated having improved skills for time management and negotiation among their social networks related to distributing home tasks and scheduling appointments. Indeed, previous studies have indicated that not only women need to be encouraged to see beyond the myths and barriers associated with physical activity in BCS, but family members and even physicians could benefit from these insights, as well [41, 54]. Our findings support this idea, as the underlying fears related to BCS performing physical activity could be seen not only during the intervention but especially before the program even started. Such barriers included several difficulties in accessing information from the health care setting relating to potential participants, and some ethics committee fears concerning approving the intervention due to perceived risks to the participants, which were not justified given the substantial evidence base supporting the benefits of such programs for BCS.

Strengths and limitations

In relation to study strengths and limitations, our multidisciplinary mixed-methods approach allowed the development of an evidence-supported, culturally relevant, and attractive behavior change intervention (i.e., a dancing protocol). However, participants noted that they also would have appreciated receiving complementary workshops regarding a healthy diet. Second, recruitment was found to be challenging in this first-generation study, particularly given some hesitation among healthcare providers to recommend physical activity to BCS, even though evidence strongly supports its benefits for this population. Nevertheless, partnerships with multisectoral institutions and the sports physician evaluation were crucial for women feeling supported in enrolment. We subsequently reported these results to clinicians and the ministry of health, creating trust and feasibility for future studies with BCS. Additionally, we learned that relevant health and behavioral outcomes for BCS that should be reported include sleep dysfunction, joint pain, specific self-efficacy measures for dancing (or corresponding types of physical activity), time management, self-care, and social networking. Likewise, for future studies involving larger samples, the analysis could benefit from being stratified by time since diagnosis, as this can be an important modifier of the intervention effects [22]. Although we confirmed the relevance of including certain portions of the health sector, the sports/recreation sector, and academia in this research, further dissemination of the program should consider the direct participation of local oncologists to recommend the community-based program.

Conclusion

My Body is a theory-driven community-based physical activity program for BCS implemented through the engagement of multi-sectoral stakeholders. It has the potential of generating behavioral changes while making use of the benefits of dance sessions as a catalyst for engaging in health-enhancing physical activity. It was tailored specifically to a real-world community setting and to meet BCS needs regarding physical, mental, and social health. We believe that the promising results found in this first-generation study in Latin America merit additional investigation in relation to this important and growing population segment in Colombia.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BPM:

Beats per minute

BMI:

Body mass index

BCS:

Breast cancer survivors

CI:

Confidence intervals

EORTC QLQ-C30:

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

GEEs:

Generalized estimating equations

HR:

Heart rate

My Body :

“My body, My Rhythm, My Voice”

QoL:

Quality of life

SD:

Standard deviation

SDT:

Self-determination theory

References

  1. Roth GA, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pardo Ramos C, Cendales Duarte R. Incidencia, mortalidad y prevalencia de Cáncer en Colombia 2007–2011; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calderón MI, Ospino MCO, Mendoza GMH, Molina CÁ. Boletín legislativo & político: Salud Pública del Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia; 2018. https://www.cancer.gov.co/conozca-sobre-cancer-1/publicaciones/2018-2-boletin-legislativo-politico.

  6. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Battaglini CL. Twenty-five years of research on the effects of exercise training in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of the literature. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(2):177 Available from: http://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v5/i2/177.htm.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Basen-Engquist K, Alfano CM, Maitin-Shepard M, Thomson CA, Schmitz KH, Pinto BM, et al. Agenda for translating physical activity, nutrition, and weight management interventions for cancer survivors into clinical and community practice. Obesity. 2017;25(1):S9–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Health & Human Services. 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mason C, Alfano CM, Smith AW, Wang CY, Neuhouser ML, Duggan C, et al. Long-term physical activity trends in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(6):1153–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips SM, Dodd KW, Steeves J, McClain J, Alfano CM, McAuley E. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: new insight into activity patterns and potential intervention targets. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(2):398–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim RB, Phillips A, Herrick K, Helou M, Rafie C, Anscher MS, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior of cancer survivors and non-cancer individuals: results from a national survey. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ortiz A, Tirado M, Hughes DC, Gonzalez V, Song J, Mama SK, et al. Relationship between physical activity, disability, and physical fitness profile in sedentary Latina breast cancer survivors. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(10):783–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1424978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ministerio de Salud. RESUMEN EJECUTIVO Primeros resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de la Situación Nutricional en Colombia ENSIN—2015; 2015. p. 64. Available from: http://www.ensin.gov.co/Documents/Resumen-ejecutivo-ENSIN-2015.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rubio MA, Guevara-Aladino P, Urbano M, Cabas S, Mejia-Arbelaez C, Rodriguez Espinosa P, et al. Innovative participatory evaluation methodologies to assess and sustain multilevel impacts of two community-based physical activity programs for women in Colombia. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):771.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller C, Fleury J. Factors related to physical activity in Hispanic women. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;21(2):142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Finne E, Glausch M, Exner AK, Sauzet O, Stölzel F, Seidel N. Behavior change techniques for increasing physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:5125–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6(10):e1077–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinto BM, Ciccolo JT. Physical activity motivation and cancer survivorship. In: Recent results in cancer research; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Short CE, James EL, Stacey F, Plotnikoff RC. A qualitative synthesis of trials promoting physical activity behaviour change among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7(4):570–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Grimmett C, Corbett T, Brunet J, Shepherd J, Pinto BM, May CR, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Emslie C, Whyte F, Campbell A, Mutrie N, Lee L, Ritchie D, et al. “I wouldn’t have been interested in just sitting round a table talking about cancer”; exploring the experiences of women with breast cancer in a group exercise trial. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(6):827–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Midtgaard J, Røssell K, Christensen JF, Uth J, Adamsen L, Rørth M. Demonstration and manifestation of self-determination and illness resistance: a qualitative study of long-term maintenance of physical activity in posttreatment cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(9):1999–2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Errico KM, Rowden D. Experiences of breast cancer survivor-advocates and advocates in countries with limited resources: a shared journey in breast cancer advocacy. Breast J. 2006;12(SUPPL. 1):S111–S6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez LG, Kerr J, Sallis JF, Slymen D, McKenzie TL, Elder JP, et al. Perceived neighborhood environmental factors that maximize the effectiveness of a multilevel intervention promoting physical activity among Latinas. Am J Heal Promot. 2018;32(2):334–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117742999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Larsen BA, Pekmezi D, Marquez B, Benitez TJ, Marcus BH. Physical activity in Latinas: social and environmental influences. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2013;9(2):201–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Díaz del Castillo A, González SA, Ríos AP, Páez DC, Torres A, Díaz MP, et al. Start small, dream big: experiences of physical activity in public spaces in Colombia. Prev Med (Baltim). 2017;103:S41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Torres A, Díaz MP, Hayat MJ, Lyn R, Pratt M, Salvo D, et al. Assessing the effect of physical activity classes in public spaces on leisure-time physical activity: “Al Ritmo de las Comunidades” a natural experiment in Bogota, Colombia. Prev Med (Baltim). 2017;103:S51–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.005.

  30. Beune E, Muilwijk M, Jelsma JGM, van Valkengoed I, Teitsma-Jansen AM, Kumar B, et al. The acceptability and effect of a culturally-tailored dance intervention to promote physical activity in women of South Asian origin at risk of diabetes in the Netherlands—a mixed-methods feasibility study. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0264191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jain S, Brown DR. Cultural dance: an opportunity to encourage physical activity and health in communities. Am J Heal Educ. 2001;32(4):216–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2001.10603469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. World Economic Forum. The inclusive development index 2018 summary and data highlights. Report. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gaffney LK, Lozano OD, Almanza A, Ruiz N, Mantero A, Stoutenberg M. The implementation of a national physical activity intervention in Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(6):430–6. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0183. Epub 2019 May 19.

  34. Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):29–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rubio MA, Mosquera D, Blanco M, Montes F, Finck C, Duval M, et al. Cross-sector co-creation of a community-based physical activity program for breast cancer survivors in Colombia. Health Promot Int. 2022;37(3):daac073. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McEwan D, Rhodes RE, Beauchamp MR. What happens when the party is over?: sustaining physical activity behaviors after intervention cessation. Behav Med. 2020;0(0):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2020.1750335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pudkasam S, Polman R, Pitcher M, Fisher M, Chinlumprasert N, Stojanovska L, et al. Physical activity and breast cancer survivors: importance of adherence, motivational interviewing and psychological health. Maturitas. 2018;116(June):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Karageorghis CI, Jones L, Priest DL, Akers RI, Clarke A, Perry JM, et al. Revisiting the relationship between exercise heart rate and music tempo preference. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(2):274–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Akimoto T, Sugawara J. Article in the journal of sports medicine and physical fitness; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Brunet J, Burke SM, Sabiston CM. The benefits of being self-determined in promoting physical activity and affective well-being among women recently treated for breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(10):2245–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(78) Available from: http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9/1/78.

  43. González-cutre D, Sicilia Á. Hacia una mayor comprensión de la motivación en el ejercicio físico : medición de la regulación integrada en el contexto español [Towards a better understanding of motivation in physical activity: measuring integrated regulation in the Spanish context ]. Psichothema. 2010;22:841–7 Available from: http://www.unioviedo.net/reunido/index.php/PST/article/view/8961/8825.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Finck C, Barradas S, Singer S, Zenger M, Hinz A. Health-related quality of life in Colombia: reference values of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21(6):829–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27(1):297–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wirtz P, Baumann FT. Physical activity, exercise and breast cancer—what is the evidence for rehabilitation, aftercare, and survival? A review. Breast Care. 2018;13(2):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rogers LQ, Vicari S, Courneya KS. Lessons learned in the trenches: facilitating exercise adherence among breast cancer survivors in a group setting. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33(6):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cerulli C, Parisi A, Sacchetti M, Tranchita E, Murri A, Minganti C, et al. Dancing with health: a new dance protocol to improve the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Med dello Sport. 2019;72(2):295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Leach HJ, Danyluk JM, Culos-Reed SN. Design and implementation of a community-based exercise program for breast cancer patients. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(5):267–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Caperchione CM, Sabiston CM, Stolp S, Bottorff JL, Campbell KL, Eves ND, et al. A preliminary trial examining a “real world” approach for increasing physical activity among breast cancer survivors: findings from project MOVE. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Szalai M, Szirmai A, Füge K, Makai A, Erdélyi G, Prémusz V, et al. Special aspects of social support: qualitative analysis of oncologic rehabilitation through a belly dancing peer support group. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017;26(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12656.

  52. Balneaves LG, Van Patten C, Truant TLO, Kelly MT, Neil SE, Campbell KL. Breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on a weight loss and physical activity lifestyle intervention. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(8):2057–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wurz A, St-Aubin A, Brunet J. Breast cancer survivors’ barriers and motives for participating in a group-based physical activity program offered in the community. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(8):2407–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Loh SY, Chew SL, Lee SY. Physical activity and women with breast cancer: insights from expert patients. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(1):87–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the breast cancer survivors, program instructors, and stakeholders for their engagement in this research. We are deeply indebted to Adriana Garzón, Sonia Arias, Patricia Vásquez, Catalina Abaúnza, Aura Arévalo, Yenny Guzmán, Camilo Triana, Laura Yañez, Marcela Urbano, Sofía Heredia, Natalia Cely, Karen Fajardo, and Paola Martínez for their assistance with study procedures.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Award 5P20CA217199A (King, Sarmiento, Finck, and Rubio) and CRDF Global Agreements OISE-19-66188 (King) and OISE-19-66198-1 (Sarmiento). We are thankful for the funding for editing and publishing provided by the Vicerrectoria de Investigaciones at Universidad de los Andes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1, #18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia

    María Alejandra Rubio, Carlos M. Mejía-Arbeláez, Sergio Moreno, Paula Guevara, Santiago Cabas, Luis Fernando Alarcón & Olga L. Sarmiento

  2. School of Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 #18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia

    Maria A. Wilches-Mogollon

  3. Department of Psychology, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 #18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia

    Carolyn Finck

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Lisa G. Rosas & Abby C. King

  5. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Lisa G. Rosas

  6. Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Manuela Beltrán, Bogotá, Colombia

    Sol A. Romero

  7. Research Department, Universidad Libre, Bogotá, Colombia

    Oscar Rubiano

  8. School of Education, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia

    Alberto Flórez-Pregonero

  9. Sports Medicine Service, Hospital de San José, Bogotá, Colombia

    José G. León

  10. Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, USA

    Robert Haile

  11. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Abby C. King

Authors
  1. María Alejandra Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos M. Mejía-Arbeláez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria A. Wilches-Mogollon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carolyn Finck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lisa G. Rosas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sol A. Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paula Guevara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Santiago Cabas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Oscar Rubiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Alberto Flórez-Pregonero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. José G. León
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Luis Fernando Alarcón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Robert Haile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Olga L. Sarmiento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Abby C. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by ACK, LGR, RH, OLS, and CF. The material preparation and data collection were performed by MAR, OLS, SAR, OR, and JGL. The analyses were performed by MAW, SM, CMM, SAR, MAR, PG, and SC, AFP, CF, LFA, and OLS led the interpretation of data. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MAR and all authors substantially revised it. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga L. Sarmiento.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee from the Universidad de los Andes in Bogotá, Colombia (Minutes no. 949 of 2018). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before study inclusion.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Components of My Body behavioral intervention.

Additional file 2.

Physical activity intensity during My Body intervention dancing-based sessions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubio, M.A., Mejía-Arbeláez, C.M., Wilches-Mogollon, M.A. et al. “My Body, My Rhythm, My Voice”: a community dance pilot intervention engaging breast cancer survivors in physical activity in a middle-income country. Pilot Feasibility Stud 9, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01253-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01253-x

Keywords

Pilot and Feasibility Studies

ISSN: 2055-5784