Morrissey C, Langdon PE, Geach N, Chester V, Ferriter M, Lindsay WR, et al. A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities. BJPsych Open. 2017;3(1):41–56.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Fogden BC, Thomas SDM, Daffern M, Ogloff JRP. Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a case linkage study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):170.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
England N. Adult Medium Secure Services including Access Assessment Service and Forensic Outreach and Liaison Services (FOLS); 2018.
Google Scholar
Hare Duke L, Furtado V, Guo B, Völlm BA. Long-stay in forensic-psychiatric care in the UK. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53(3):313–21.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Iozzino L, Ferrari C, Large M, Nielssen O, de Girolamo G. Prevalence and risk factors of violence by psychiatric acute inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128536.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bulgari V, Ferrari C, Pagnini F, de Girolamo G, Iozzino L. Aggression in mental health residential facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2018;41:119–27.
Google Scholar
Bowers L, Stewart D, Papadopoulos C, Dack C, Ross J, Khanom H, et al. Inpatient violence and aggression: a literature review. Report from the Conflict and Containment Reduction Research Programme. London: Institute of Psychiatry and Kings College London; 2011.
Google Scholar
Tyrer F, McGrother CW, Thorp CF, Donaldson M, Bhaumik S, Watson JM, et al. Physical aggression towards others in adults with learning disabilities: prevalence and associated factors. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50(Pt 4):295–304.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Embregts PJ, Didden R, Huitink C, Schreuder N. Contextual variables affecting aggressive behaviour in individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities who live in a residential facility. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53(3):255–64.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Embregts PJ, Didden R, Schreuder N, Huitink C, van Nieuwenhuijzen M. Aggressive behavior in individuals with moderate to borderline intellectual disabilities who live in a residential facility: an evaluation of functional variables. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(4):682–8.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jahoda A, Wanless LK. Knowing you: the interpersonal perceptions of staff towards aggressive individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities in situations of conflict. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49(Pt 7):544–51.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jahoda A, Pert C, Squire J, Trower P. Facing stress and conflict: a comparison of the predicted responses and self-concepts of aggressive and non-aggressive people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1998;42(Pt 5):360–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jahoda A, Trower P, Pert C, Finn D. Contingent reinforcement or defending the self? A review of evolving models of aggression in people with mild learning disabilities. Br J Med Psychol. 2001;74(3):305–21.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jahoda A, Pert C, Trower P. Frequent aggression and attribution of hostile intent in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: an empirical investigation. Am J Ment Retard. 2006;111(2):90–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
MacMahon KMA, Jahoda A, Espie CA, Broomfield NM. The influence of anger-arousal level on attribution of hostile intent and problem solving capability in an individual with a mild intellectual disability and a history of difficulties with aggression. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2006;19(1):99–107.
Google Scholar
Pert C, Jahoda A, Squire J. Attribution of intent and role-taking: cognitive factors as mediators of aggression with people who have mental retardation. Am J Ment Retard. 1999;104(5):399–409.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
MacInnes D, Masino S. Psychological and psychosocial interventions offered to forensic mental health inpatients: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e024351.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Taylor JL, Lindsay WR. Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Future Directions for Research and Practice. In: Lindsay WR, Taylor JL, editors. The Wiley Handbook on Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Research, Training and Practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2018. p. 453–71.
Google Scholar
NICE. Mental health problems in people with learning disabilities: prevention, assessment and management. (NICE Clinical Guideline NG54), vol. 2016. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2016.
Google Scholar
Hackett SS, Ashby L, Parker K, Goody S, Power N. UK art therapy practice-based guidelines for children and adults with learning disabilities. Int J Art Ther. 2017;22(2):84–94.
Google Scholar
Uttley L, Scope A, Stevenson M, Rawdin A, Taylor Buck E, Sutton A, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of art therapy among people with non-psychotic mental health disorders. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2015;19(18):1–120 v-vi.
Google Scholar
Hackett SS. Art psychotherapy with adult offenders who have intellectual and developmental disabilities. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Northumbria; 2012.
Google Scholar
Hackett SS, Porter J, Taylor JL. The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) method: Testing with adult offenders who have intellectual and developmental disabilities. Adv Mental Health Intellec Disabil. 2013;7(5):263–71.
Google Scholar
Hackett S. Art Psychotherapy with an adult with autistic spectrum disorder and sexually deviant dreams: a single-case study including the client’s responses to treatment. In: Rothwell K, editor. Forensic arts therapies: anthology of practice and research. London: Free Association Books Limited; 2016.
Google Scholar
Hackett SS, Aafjes-van DK. Psychodynamic art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in an individual with antisocial personality disorder in a secure forensic hospital: A single-case design study. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill). 2019;56(2):297–308.
Google Scholar
Hackett SS, Taylor JL, Freeston M, Jahoda A, McColl E, Pennington L, et al. Interpersonal art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in people with learning disabilities in secure care: a protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017;3(1):42.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Baskin TW, Tierney SC, Minami T, Wampold BE. Establishing specificity in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis of structural equivalence of placebo controls. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(6):973–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Enck P, Zipfel S. Placebo effects in psychotherapy: a framework. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10(456). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00456.
Popp L, Schneider S. Attention placebo control in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions: theory and practice. Trials. 2015;16:150.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mantzios M, Giannou K. When did coloring books become mindful? Exploring the effectiveness of a novel method of mindfulness-guided instructions for coloring books to increase mindfulness and decrease anxiety. Front Psychol. 2018;9(56).
Sidani S, Miranda J, Epstein DR, Bootzin RR, Cousins J, Moritz P. Relationships between personal beliefs and treatment acceptability, and preferences for behavioral treatments. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(10):823–9.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kazdin AE. Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Google Scholar
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
Google Scholar
Department of Health. In: Health Do, editor. Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice. London: HM Government; 1999.
Google Scholar
Arscott K, Dagnan D, Kroese BS. Consent to psychological research by people with an intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 1998;11(1):77–83.
Google Scholar
Luborsky L. The relationship anecdote paradigm (RAP) interview as a versatile source of narratives. In: Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P, editors. Understanding transference: the core conflictual relationship theme method. 2nd ed. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 109–20.
Google Scholar
Ashby D. Practical statistics for medical research. Douglas G. Altman, Chapman and Hall, London, 1991. No. of pages: 611. Price: £32.00. Statist Med. 1991;10(10):1635–6.
Google Scholar
Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46.
Google Scholar
McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–82.
Google Scholar
Oliver PC, Crawford M, Rao B, Reece B, Tyrer P. Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) for people with intellectual disability and aggressive challenging behaviour: A reliability study. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2007;20(4):368–72.
Google Scholar
Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) administration, scoring, and procedures manual, vol. 1993. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, Inc; 1993.
Google Scholar
Kellett S, Beail N, Newman DW, Frankish P. Utility of the brief symptom inventory in the assessment of psychological distress. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2003;16(2):127–34.
Google Scholar
Kellett S, Beail N, Newman DW, Hawes A. The factor structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory: Intellectual disability evidence. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2004;11(4):275–81.
Google Scholar
Novaco RW. The Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory Manual (NAS-PI), vol. 2003. Los Angeles: CA Western Psychological Services; 2003.
Google Scholar
Mindham J, Espie CA. Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with an Intellectual Disability (GAS-ID): development and psychometric properties of a new measure for use with people with mild intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003;47(1):22–30.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Al-Janabi H. An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure. Qual Life Res. 2013;22.
Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the Icecap-a capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Economics. 2015;24(3):258–69.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(1):167–76.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mitchell PM, Roberts TE, Barton PM, Coast J. Assessing sufficient capability: a new approach to economic evaluation. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2015;139:71–9.
Google Scholar
Helter TM, Coast J, Łaszewska A, Stamm T, Simon J. Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2019;29:1433–1464.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02393-5.
Munder T, Wilmers F, Leonhart R, Linster HW, Barth J. Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR): psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;17(3):231–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Horvath AO, Bedi RP. The alliance. Psychotherapy relationships that work: therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 37–69.
Google Scholar
Tichenor V, Hill CE. A comparison of six measures of working alliance. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 1989;26(2):195–9.
Google Scholar
Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36:223–33.
Google Scholar
Dye L. Factors Impacting on the Capacity to Consent in People with Learning Disabilities. Tizard Learn Disabil Rev. 2003;8(3):11–20.
Google Scholar
Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press; 1985.
Google Scholar
Davis K, Minckas N, Bond V, Clark CJ, Colbourn T, Drabble SJ, et al. Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions. Trials. 2019;20(1):329.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Finch TL, Girling M, May CR, Mair FS, Murray E, Treweek S, et al. NoMad: Implementation measure based on normalization process theory 2015. Available from: http://www.normalizationprocess.org.
Google Scholar
Hinchey LM. Mindfulness-Based Art Therapy: A Review of the Literature. Inquiries J. 2018;10(05) Available from: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=1737.
Curry NA, Kasser T. Can coloring mandalas reduce anxiety? Art Ther. 2005;22(2):81–5.
Google Scholar
Sim J. Should treatment effects be estimated in pilot and feasibility studies? Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):107.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Hackett S. Treatment of aggression in people with intellectual disabilities in secure hospital: a randomised controlled feasibility study of interpersonal art psychotherapy. In: Callaghan P, Oud N, Nijman H, Palmstierna T, Dusxbury J, editors. Violence in Clinical Psychiatry, Proceedings of the 11th European Congress Oslo. Norway: Oud Consulancy; 2019. p. 258–60.
Google Scholar