The feasibility and acceptability of a rewards system based on food purchasing behaviour in secondary school cashless canteens: the Eat4Treats (E4T) cluster feasibility, non-randomised, controlled intervention study

Table 5 Summary of rewards claimed during the E4T scheme^a

	Total n (%) [95% CI]	Intervention school 1 (rural); n (%) [95% CI]	Intervention school 2 (urban); n (%) [95% CI]
Number of rewards claimed	85	66 (78%) [67.3%, 86.0%]	19 (22%) [14.0%, 32.7%]
Number of pupils that claimed reward/s	41	29 (71%) [54.5%, 83.9%]	12 (29%) [16.1%, 45.5%]
Type of reward:
Stationery (e.g. eraser)	69 (81%) [71.2%, 88.8%]	56 (85%) [73.9%, 92.5%]	13 (68%) [43.5%, 87.4%]
Sports (e.g. football)	6 (7%) [2.6%, 14.7%]	4 (6%) [1.7%, 14.8%]	2 (11%) [1.3%, 33.1%]
Electronic items (e.g. earphones)	4 (5%) [1.3%,11.6%]	3 (4.5%) [1.0%, 12.7%]	1 (5%) [0.1%, 26.0%]
Vouchers	6 (7%) [2.6%, 14.7%]	3 (4.5%) [1.0%, 12.7%]	3 (16%) [3.4%, 39.6%]

^aBased on n = 179 pupils who consented to take part in feasibility study and successfully registered for E4T scheme

ISSN: 2055-5784