Skip to main content

Table 3 Completion rates of data collection procedures in the E4T feasibility study

From: The feasibility and acceptability of a rewards system based on food purchasing behaviour in secondary school cashless canteens: the Eat4Treats (E4T) cluster feasibility, non-randomised, controlled intervention study

 

Control school

n = 158 pupils

n (%)

[95% CI]

Intervention school 1 (rural)

n = 90 pupils

n (%)

[95% CI]

Intervention school 2 (urban)

n = 233 pupils

n (%)

[95% CI]

Questionnaires

 Pre

95 (60.1)

[52.0%, 67.8%]

68 (75.6)

[65.4%, 84.0%]

133 (57.1)

[50.5%, 63.5%]

 Post

77 (48.7)

[40.7%, 56.8%]

64 (71.1)

[60.6%, 80.2%]

0

[0%, 0%]

Canteen observationsa

 Pre

-

19 (21.1)

[13.2%, 31.0%]

19 (8.2)

[5.0%, 12.4%]

 Post

-

16 (17.8)

[10.5%, 27.3%]

13 (5.6)

[3.0%, 9.4%]

24-h recalls

 Pre (weekday)

12 (7.6)

[4.0%, 12.9%]

16 (17.8)

[10.5%, 27.3%]

21 (9.0) and 21 (9.0)

[5.7%, 13.5%]

 Pre (weekend)

15 (9.5)

[5.4%, 15.2%]

15 (16.7)

[9.6%, 26.0%]

0

[0%, 0%]

 Post (weekday)

15 (9.5)

[5.4%, 15.2%]

14 (15.6)

[8.8%, 24.7%]

18 (7.7)

[4.6%, 11.9%]

 Post (weekend)

18 (11.4)

[6.9%, 17.4%]

0

[0%, 0%]

14 (6.0)

[3.3%, 9.9%]

  1. aComplete observations, i.e. both pre- and post-meal picture taken