Skip to main content

Table 2 AST-R: between training and expectancy conditions across measurement timepoints: means and standard deviations reported

From: The influence of outcome expectancy on interpretation bias training in social anxiety: an experimental pilot study

Condition

CBM-I (n = 18)

Placebo (n = 16)

Time

T0

T1

T0

T1

Pos. interpretations

14.83 (3.60)

18.22 (3.86)

13.94 (2.26)

14.50 (3.22)

Neg. interpretations

19.83 (3.43)

16.06 (4.52)

19.44 (3.88)

20.19 (4.09)

Condition

E+ (n = 21)

E0 (n = 13)

Time

T0

T1

T0

T1

Pos. interpretations

14.05 (2.75)

17.05 (3.34)

15.00 (3.49)

15.54 (4.87)

Neg. interpretations

19.81 (3.12)

17.81 (4.65)

19.38 (4.41)

18.21 (5.06)

  1. AST-R Ambiguous scenarios recognition task [13], CBM-I Cognitive bias modification for interpretation, E+ Positive outcome expectation, E0 No outcome expectation, Pos. interpretations Similarity scores for positive interpretations, Neg. interpretations Similarity scores for negative interpretations, T0 Pre-training assessment timepoint, T1 Post-training assessment timepoint, Diff. Difference scores from t0 (pre-training assessment) to t1 (post-training assessment)
Back to article page

Pilot and Feasibility Studies

ISSN: 2055-5784