Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: IMproving facial PRosthesis construction with contactlESs Scanning and Digital workflow (IMPRESSeD): study protocol for a feasibility crossover randomised controlled trial of digital versus conventional manufacture of facial prostheses in patients with orbital or nasal facial defects

Original Submission
24 Sep 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shahnawaz Khijmatgar
13 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay McHutchion
13 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Rachael Y Jablonski
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay McHutchion
23 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shahnawaz Khijmatgar
5 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Rachael Y Jablonski
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Rachael Y Jablonski
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Jun 2023 Editorially accepted
3 Jul 2023 Article published 10.1186/s40814-023-01351-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page