Skip to main content

Table 5 Self-reported feasibility outcomes for limited efficacy among caregivers who completed the SFH-SC pilot

From: Systematic braiding of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare to address child maltreatment risk and secondhand smoke exposure: findings from a pilot study

Variable

Baseline (n = 8)

Post-SFH SC (n = 8)

Mean difference

Smoking questions [no. of participants (%)]

 Current smoker

  Yes

2 (25.0)

2 (25.0)

 

  No

6 (75.0)

6 (75.5)

 

 Live in the same household with someone who smokes

  Yes

7 (87.5)

8 (100.0)

 

  No

1 (12.5)

0 (0.0)

 

 Number of smokers in the home

  1

7 (87.5)

  

  2

1 (12.5)

  

Smoke-free home rules

 Current enforcement of smoke-free home rules

  Not allowed anywhere inside

4 (50.0)

5 (62.5)

 

  Allowed in some places or at some times

4 (50.0)

3 (37.5)

 

  Allowed anywhere inside

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

  No smoke-free home rules

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

Products covered by smoke-free home rules*

 Smoke from cigarettes

7 (87.5)

8 (100)

 

 Cigars/cigarillos

4 (50.0)

5 (62.5)

 

 Marijuana

4 (50.0)

6 (75.0)

 

 Vapor/aerosol from ENDS

5 (62.5)

6 (75.0)

 

Frequency of smoking rules being broken

 Never

3 (37.5)

3 (37.5)

 

 Rarely

3 (37.5)

3 (37.5)

 

 Sometimes

2 (25.0)

0 (0.0)

 

 Very often

0 (0.0)

2 (25.0)

 

Parenting stress inventory [mean (SD)]

 Defensive responding subscalea

15.6 (4.7)

14.3 (5.6)

1.4 (2.1)

 Parental distressb

45.8 (6.7)

22.4 (8.1)

2.4 (4.7)

 Parent–child dysfunctional interactionc

18.5 (4.9)

16.0 (5.3)

2.5 (4.6)

 Difficult childd

26.3 (11.4)

25.3 (9.3)

1.0 (7.3)

 Total scoree

69.5 (21.3)

63.6 (18.8)

5.9 (10.2)

  1. ENDS electronic nicotine delivery system. aSummary of 7 items; possible range, 7–35. bPossible range, 12–60. cPossible range, 12–60. dPossible range, 12–60. ePossible range: 136–180