Skip to main content

Table 2 List and definitions of cognitive distortions (CDS)a and select examples of terms in the CDSa lexicon

From: Assessing rigid modes of thinking in self-declared abortion ideology: natural language processing insights from an online pilot qualitative study on abortion attitudes

Distortion

Definition

Select terms

Example sentence

Labeling and mislabeling

A way of thinking characterized by how we overgeneralize a trait to the whole person

I am a

I am a firm believer that abortion is a woman's choice”

He is a

They are a

Catastrophizing

A way of thinking characterized by predicting an outcome or jumping to a conclusion that may or may not happen

…Will go wrong

“If she has an abortion, it will be terrible for her family”

…Will be terrible

…Will be a disaster

Dichotomous reasoning

A way of thinking characterized by polarized (i.e., black and white) expressions

Only

“I have always felt that abortions are morally wrong”

Ever

Always

Emotional reasoning

A way of thinking characterized by drawing conclusions using emotional truth over empirical evidence

But I feel

“Abortion are legal; but I feel they should not be”

Because I feel

Since it feels

Disqualifying the positive

A way of thinking characterized by filtering out a positive experience and focusing only on negative aspects

…Great but

“Abortions are great but at what cost?”

…Acceptable, yet

…. Not that good

Magnification and minimization

A way of thinking characterized by exaggerating or dismissing key ideas

Worst

“Criminalizing abortion would be the worst decision ever”

Best

No matter

Mental filtering

A way of thinking characterized by projecting one's views outward

All I see

All I see are millions of unborn babies being killed”

…Can only think

If I only

Mind reading

A way of thinking characterized by assuming one's personal views mirror others

Everyone knows

Everyone knows abortion is a public good even if they won't admit it”

No one believes

They all know

Fortune-telling

A way of thinking characterized by attempting to predict what is largely unknown

I will not…

They will not outlaw abortion outright, there's just no way!”

We will not…

He/she will…

Overgeneralizing

A way of thinking characterized by viewing a single event as an invariable rule

Completely

“Regretting an abortion? It will always happen!”

Always happens

Every single time

Personalizing

A way of thinking characterized by placing blame entirely on oneself even if disconnected from the event

All me

“I tend to not have many friends because of my liberal abortion views”

Because of my

My responsibility

Normative statements

A way of thinking characterized by projecting one's views as correct or right

Should [not]

“We should be honoring a baby's right to life!”

Ought [not]

Must

  1. aCDS is an acronym for the cognitive distortion schemata. Please also note terms listed per CDS are non-exhaustive