From: Development of an Internet-delivered educational video for acute whiplash injuries
Professionals focused on | Laypersons focused on |
---|---|
• That laypersons would not understand specific phrases used (no consensus between different professionals on exact phrases) • Details of animations and visuals (often suggesting more detail or expansions to explain symptoms) • Found visual content calming • Suggested improvements for making the visual edit appear more professional • Improvement of sound and lighting • Questioning whether participants were convincing and skilled in presentation and looking into the camera | • Whether the doctors seemed nice and which doctor they personally preferred to listen to (differed greatly) • Found the footage and animations convincing and credible • Found information easily comprehensible • Content acceptable and calming • The tone of speech was too low/dark • Speech not clearly audible in all segments • The speed of the edit was found appropriate • Preferring footage of “what to do” rather than doctors giving too much detailed information • Would prefer a slightly shorter video |