Table 3 ABHR distribution in intervention villages (n = 5) with participants (N = 55)
| Â | Via VHW | Via pharmacy | Overall | Difference (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Villages assigned | 60.0% (3/5) | 40.0% (2/5) | 100% (5/5) | 20 (−67.7:107.7) |
Women wished to receive refills (self-reported) | 70.9% (39/55) | 29.1% (16/55) | 100% (55/55) | 41.8 (15.4:68.2) |
Women actually refilled (self-reported at follow-up) | 65.5% (36/55)2 | 25.5% (14/55)3 | 90.9% (50/55) | 40 (12.4:67.6) |
ABHR volume dispensed to women (litres; mean, range) | 3.7 (2.8:4.1) | 2.5 (2.0: 3.1) | 3.1 (2.0: 4.1) | 1.2 (1.09:1.31) |
ABHR use/day (self-reported; mean, range) | 7.0 (6.0:10) | 6.2 (5.0:8.1) | 6.6 (6.0:10.0) | 0.8 (04.46:1.14) |
ABHR accountability | ||||
 ABHR volume delivered (litres) | 40 | 20 | 60 | – |
 ABHR accounted for (litres) | 40 | 15 | 55 | – |