Construct | Measure | Respondent | Time point | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mother | Family | Home visitor | O1 | O2 | O3 | ||
1. Feasibility and acceptability of implementing the treatment in HV. | |||||||
Knowledge | Pass test on the use of video software. | Â | Â | X | X | Â | Â |
Percent of eligible families identified.a | Â | Â | X | Â | X | Â | |
Adherence | Percent of families educated in use of video software.b | Â | Â | X | Â | X | Â |
Percent of visits with coping skill reinforcement.b | Â | Â | X | Â | X | Â | |
Home visiting Staff responsiveness | Percent of training sessions attended.a | Â | Â | X | X | Â | Â |
Percent of supervision sessions attended. | Â | Â | X | Â | X | Â | |
Percent of implementation meetings attended.a | Â | Â | X | Â | X | Â | |
Satisfaction, usefulness, and relevance of family support team responsibilities from focus groups. | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | X | |
2. Feasibility and acceptability of implementing treatment with families. | |||||||
Quality of delivery | Working Alliance Inventories—therapist and client versions [49, 50].c | X | X |  |  | X | X |
Retention | Percent of families who complete treatment. | X | X | Â | Â | Â | X |
Family responsiveness | Percent of completed homework assignments. | X | X | Â | Â | X | Â |
Satisfaction questionnaire developed by team. | X | X | Â | Â | Â | X | |
3. Evidence of clinical effectiveness of the treatment. | |||||||
Depression | SCID-V Depression Module [55]; NIMH DISC-Y and DISC-P Mood Module for those under 18 [56].d | X | Â | Â | Â | X | Â |
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) [57].d | X | Â | Â | Â | X | X | |
Emotion regulation | Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) [58], ERQ Child and Adolescent Version for those under 18 [59]. | X | X | Â | Â | X | X |
Parental empathy | Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory-II (AAPI-II) [60]. | X | Â | Â | Â | X | X |
Family functioning | Protective Factors Survey, Family Functioning/Resiliency subscale [61]. | X | X | Â | Â | X | X |