Skip to main content

Table 6 Benefits of using the app: scores on adherence and well-being before and after app use (N = 11)

From: Development, feasibility testing and perceived benefits of a new app to help with adherence to antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV in Brazil

 

Pretest

Posttest

Wilcoxon signed rank test

Effect size

95% CI for rank-biserial correlation

Variable

Mean (SD), Mdn

Mean (SD), Mdn

W

Z (p)

Rank-biserial correlation

Lower

Upper

Compliance (CEAT-VIH)

13.18 (2.13), 13

13.09 (2.66), 14

27.000

 − 0.051 (1.00)

 − 0.018

 − 0.615

0.592

Antecedents of nonadherence (CEAT-VIH)

17.90 (2.16), 18

18.45 (2.01), 20

4.000

 − 0.944 (0.410)

 − 0.467

 − 0.900

0.433

Treatment satisfaction (CEAT-VIH)

7.63 (2.24), 8

8.09 (1.86), 9

7.000

 − 0.734 (0.520)

 − 0.333

 − 0.845

0.496

Doctor–patient communications (CEAT-VIH)

12.54 (3.07), 14

12.63 (2.46), 14

12.000

 − 0.338 (0.792)

 − 0.143

 − 0.750

0.594

Personal beliefs and expectations about their treatment (CEAT-VIH)

21.00 (3.46), 20

22.18 (2.52), 23

11.000

 − 1.362 (0.189)

 − 0.511

 − 0.862

0.169

Global adherence score (total score of the CEAT-VIH)

72.27 (8.84), 75

74.45 (8.21), 78

15.500

 − 1.223 (0.240)

 − 0.436

 − 0.823

0.227

Perceived well-being (WHO-5)

8.63 (4.52), 8

10.36 (4.31), 12

15.000

 − 1.274 (0.220)

 − 0.455

 − 0.830

0.206

  1. Note: The rank-biserial correlation (rB) can be considered as an effect size and is interpreted the same as Pearson’s r. The r value varies from 0 to close to 1. The interpretation values for r commonly in published literature and on the internet are as follows: 0.1 – < 0.3 (small effect), 0.3 – < 0.5 (moderate effect) and ≥ 0.5 (large effect). Mdn = median, CI  confidence interval