Problem identified during the feasibility trial | Change made for the definitive trial |
---|---|
Attrition of wards and participants | Over recruit wards and increase the recruitment target to 25 patients per ward over a 5-month period |
A relatively high margin of error when using routinely coded emergency readmission data as the primary outcome for our target patient population | We will seek permission from the Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) and Research Ethics Committee (REC) to check the actual discharge destinations of patients in the definitive trial via a nonindividual consent process |
Attrition of self-reported data at 30- and 90-day follow-ups | We will make the data collection periods at 5 and 30 days more distinct. We will provide a supportive telephone call to all participants at each follow up |
Booklet use was influenced by patients’ fluctuating capacity and health. The prop-up feature was rarely used | The language in the booklet will be simplified and its overall length reduced. The prop-up feature will be removed. Staff training will include greater emphasis on communication with patients and encouraging the booklets use |
Limited delivery of the patient-friendly care summary | Care summary tailored at a ward rather than individual level to reduce associated risks. Distributed flexibly at a suitable time during the patients stay |
Difficulty accessing the patient film | Intervention wards will be provided with a tablet to show the patient film |
Managing risks associated with the flexible activities to enhance health, medicines, daily activities, and escalation | Engage a broader multidisciplinary team earlier during study set-up to explore what types of activities staff could engage with |
Difficulties implementing and distributing the intervention | Greater emphasis on leadership and teamwork during setup. Explore the supporting role of volunteers and/or quality improvement teams |