Main category | Associated key messagesa |
---|---|
Previous experiences with audiovisual teleconsultation and outpatient needs | No experience of the GP |
Clinical experience of the neurologist | |
Inadequate and uncertain current care situation of the target group | |
Expectations regarding outpatient telemedicine | Hopes of the GP for more patient and family safety and improvement of own medical care practice |
Neurologist’s desire for adequate treatment | |
GP concerns about mental and social overload of insecure patients and patients in need of care | |
Neurologist’s concern of a higher time expenditure | |
Implementation in the practice including preparation, results, and follow-up | Sensitive selection of suitable patients |
Most preparation effort on the part of the GP | |
Moderation by GP, inclusion of all parties in case discussion, shared information exchange | |
Initial diagnosis | |
planning of further therapy and diagnostic steps | |
anxiety and stress reducing measures | |
Documentation and follow-up by GP and neurologist | |
Balancing and evaluation of results | Facilitated access to specialist care and improved rural supply |
Suitable for target group, possible follow-up with other patient groups with clinical findings | |
Positive impact on doctor-patient relationship | |
More transparent therapy planning for GP and patient | |
Improved education and level of information for all parties | |
Reassurance of the GP and family carers | |
High acceptance by patients and relatives and clarity about positive conditions for acceptance | |
Positive cost-benefit ratio in terms of time spent and effectiveness from neurologist’s perspective | |
Future challenges and wishes | Optimisation of scheduling |
Possible increase of the number of patients and diagnoses | |
Implementation in acute care | |
Simplified documentation and billability of the specialist consultation |