Skip to main content

Table 5 Satisfaction levels reported by intervention recipients and intervention providers on aspects of the Girls Active Project at mid-intervention and post-intervention

From: Feasibility of a peer-led, after-school physical activity intervention for disadvantaged adolescent females during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Girls Active Project (GAP)

Aspect of the Girls Active Project intervention

Intervention recipients (n = 5)

Intervention recipients (n = 7)

Intervention providers (n = 6)

Categorisationa

Week 8: mid-intervention (phase 1)

Week 12: post-intervention (phase 2)

Week 12: post-intervention (overall)

Mean (SD)

Range

Mean (SD)

Range

Mean (SD)

Range

Organisation

4.6 (0.55)

4–5

5.0 (.00)

5–5

4.3 (0.82)

3–5

Feasible

Class duration

4.6 (0.55)

4–5

5.0 (.00)

5–5

4.2 (0.41)

4–5

Feasible

Dates of delivery

4.8 (0.45)

4–5

4.7 (0.76)

3–5

4.0 (1.1)

2–5

Feasible

Start and end time

4.8 (0.45)

4–5

5.0 (.00)

5–5

3.5 (0.55)

3–4

Feasible

Variety of activities

4.4 (0.89)

3–5

4.9 (0.38)

4–5

4.8 (0.41)

4–5

Feasible

Delivery of activities (project leaders)

4.8 (0.45)

4–5

4.9 (0.38)

4–5

NA

NA

Feasible

Information provided

4.6 (0.55)

4–5

4.6 (0.79)

3–5

NA

NA

Feasible

It being online

3.4 (0.55)

3–4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Not feasible

It being in person

NA

NA

5.0 (.00)

5–5

NA

NA

Feasible

Being a leader delivering the classes

NA

NA

NA

NA

4.8 (0.41)

4–5

Feasible

Completing the weekly logbooks

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.3 (1.0)

2–5

Not feasible

Working as part of a team

NA

NA

NA

NA

4.7 (0.52)

4–5

Feasible

Overall satisfaction

5.0 (.00)

5–5

4.7 (0.76)

3–5

4.7 (0.52)

4–5

Feasible

  1. Scale scores: 5-point Likert scale (1: dislike very much to 5: like very much)
  2. Abbreviations: SD standard deviation, NA not applicable
  3. aA predetermined mean score of ≥ 3.5 out of 5 was considered feasible