Skip to main content

Table 4 Patient-reported outcomes, shoulder range of motion, and use of analgesics before and after the progressive shoulder exercise intervention on 18 patients

From: Are progressive shoulder exercises feasible in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tear arthropathy?

Outcome measures

Baseline score Mean (95% CI)

Follow-up score Mean (95% CI)

Change score Mean (95% CI)

WOOS (0–100, 100 best)

42 (33; 52)

65 (55; 76)

23 (13; 33)*

DASH (0–100, 100 worst)

42 (35; 50)

30 (22; 37)

− 13 (− 19; − 6)*

EQ-5D-5L

 Utility index (− 1, 1 best)

0.66 (0.61; 0.72)

0.73 (0.67; 0.79)

0.06 (0.001; 0.14)

 VAS (0–100, 100 best)

65 (54; 75)

73 (62; 84)

8 (6; 22)

Subjective shoulder value (0–100, 100 best)

45 (37; 53)

62 (53;71)

17 (5; 30)**

Pain (0–100, 100 worst)

 VAS at rest

51 (38; 64)

28 (17; 40)

− 23 (− 36; − 9)**

 VAS during activity

66 (54; 77)

39 (25; 52)

− 27 (− 39: − 15)*

 Sleep disturbing pain (yes/no)

17/1

9/8a

0.005b

AROM

 Flexion, degrees

110 (96; 125)

127 (112; 143)

17 (3; 31)

 Abduction, degrees

99 (85; 112)

124 (110; 138)

25 (13; 37)

Usage of analgesics

 Yes/no

18/0

15/3

 

 Daily/weekly/never

10/7/0a

9/6/3

 

 Paracetamol (yes/no)

18/0

13/5

 

 NSAIDs (yes/no)

3/15

3/15

 

 Opiods (yes/no)

2/16

0/18

 
  1. WOOS Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score, DASH Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, VAS visual analogue scale, AROM active range of motion
  2. *Significant p value < 0.001
  3. **Significant p value < 0.01
  4. aMissing data on 1 patient
  5. bChi2