Skip to main content

Table 1 Decision-making targets, decision coaching components, and theory-driven peer specialist enhancements

From: Facilitating treatment engagement for early psychosis through peer-delivered decision support: intervention development and protocol for pilot evaluation

Target (A. M. O'Connor et al. 1998) [22]

Decision coaching components (Stacey et al. 2012) [56]

Theory-driven peer specialist enhancements

Theoretical Rationale (M. S. Salzer, 2002; M. S. Salzer and Kottsieper, 2015; Solomon, 2004) [20, 47, 48]

(a) Knowledge deficiencies

Provision of factual information about options, benefits, and risks; verification of understanding

Share personal experiences to enhance practical knowledge

Experiential knowledge

(b) Unrealistic expectations

Share personal experiences; provide examples of positive behaviors to correct misperceptions about mental illness and treatment

Experiential knowledge, social learning theory

(c) Unclear values

Values clarification

Encourage personal choice; explore values/preferences

Self-determination theory

(d) Social pressure

Building skills for deliberation, communication, and assessing support

Model and help consumers build communication and self-advocacy skills; provide emotional and informational support

Self-determination theory, social learning theory; social support theory; social comparison theory

(e) Lack of social support

(f) Discrepancies between desired and actual role in decision-making

(g) Low self-efficacy

Screening for barriers to implementation; facilitating progress in decision-making

Provide social support and model positive behaviors to enhance self-efficacy

Social support theory, self-efficacy theory

(h) Lack of resources

Provide information about resources; facilitate connection to professional and natural supports

Experiential knowledge