|
Characteristic
| |
Study camps
| |
|---|
|
Overall (N = 57)
|
All interventions (n = 15)
|
Entrepreneurship (n = 15)
|
Beekeeping (n = 15)
|
Health/Control (n = 12)
|
p value*
|
|---|
| |
n (%)
|
n (%)
|
n (%)
|
n (%)
|
n (%)
| |
|---|
|
Educational attainment
| | | | | |
.41
|
|
Primary
|
24 (42.1)
|
5 (33.3)
|
5 (33.3)
|
8 (53.3)
|
6 (50.0)
|
|
Secondary
|
25 (43.9)
|
8 (53.3)
|
5 (33.3)
|
6 (40.0)
|
6 (50.0)
|
|
Vocational training
|
5 (8.8)
|
2 (13.3)
|
2 (13.3)
|
1 (6.7)
|
0 (0.0)
|
|
Diploma
|
3 (5.3)
|
0 (0.0)
|
3 (20.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
|
Occupation
| | | | | |
< .01
|
|
Dependent
|
5 (8.8)
|
4 (26.7)
|
1 (6.7)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
|
Unskilled laborer
|
25 (43.9)
|
8 (53.3)
|
6 (40.0)
|
10 (66.7)
|
1 (8.3)
|
|
Driver
|
9 (15.8)
|
1 (6.7)
|
0 (0.0)
|
2 (13.3)
|
6 (50.0)
|
|
Semiskilled
|
9 (15.8)
|
1 (6.7)
|
4 (26.7)
|
1 (6.7)
|
3 (25.0)
|
|
Microbusiness
|
9 (15.8)
|
1 (6.7)
|
4 (26.7)
|
2 (13.3)
|
2 (16.7)
|
|
Has dependents
| | | | | |
.08
|
|
No
|
22 (38.6)
|
10 (66.7)
|
4 (26.7)
|
5 (33.3)
|
3 (25.0)
|
|
Yes
|
35 (61.4)
|
5 (33.3)
|
11 (73.3)
|
10 (66.7)
|
9 (75.0)
|
|
Role in violence
| | | | | |
.17
|
|
Victim
|
3 (5.3)
|
1 (6.7)
|
1 (6.7)
|
1 (6.7)
|
1 (8.3)
|
|
Participant
|
14 (24.6)
|
5 (33.3)
|
3 (20.0)
|
2 (13.3)
|
4 (33.3)
|
|
Witness
|
15 (26.3)
|
6 (40.0)
|
4 (26.7)
|
1 (6.7)
|
4 (33.3)
|
|
None reported
|
25 (43.9)
|
3 (20.0)
|
7 (46.7)
|
11 (73.3)
|
3 (25.0)
|
| |
Mdn (IQR)
|
Mdn (IQR)
|
Mdn (IQR)
|
Mdn (IQR)
|
Mdn (IQR)
| |
|
Age (years)
|
20 (18–24)
|
18 (18–19)
|
25 (22–32)
|
22 (18–25)
|
18 (17.5–22)
|
< .01
|
|
Daily income
|
5000 (1750–10,000)
|
5000 (1500–7000)
|
5000 (0–10,000)
|
5000 (2000–10,000)
|
5000 (2000–10,000)
|
.08
|
|
Weekly income
|
21,000 (5000–50,000)
|
20,000 (4500–45,000)
|
20,000 (10,000–50,000)
|
18,000 (0–30,000)
|
40,000 (14,000–100,000)
|
.02
|
|
Asset index
|
7 (6–7)
|
6.0 (5–7)
|
6.0 (6–7)
|
7.0 (7–8)
|
6.0 (5–7.5)
|
.17
|
- *Based on Fisher’s exact test or ANOVA. Notes. TzS Tanzanian shilling, IQR interquartile range
