Skip to main content

Table 3 Relative inclusion of criteria for transparency based on each study characteristic for informed consent documents before and after research ethics board review

From: Transparency of informed consent in pilot and feasibility studies is inadequate: a single-center quality assurance study

Study characteristic

Studies that use the term “pilot” or “feasibility” in the title of the consent forms (%)

Studies that define the term pilot/ feasibility in consent forms (%)

Studies that state objective to assess feasibility in consent forms (%)

Studies that state specific feasibility objectives in consent forms (%)

 

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Term used in title of the study

 “Pilot” (n = 147)

78.9

82.3

9.5

12.9

32.0

34.0

16.3

16.3

 “Feasibility” (n = 32)

87.5

87.5

6.3

6.3

75.0

75.0

28.1

28.1

 Both (n = 5)

80.0

80.0

20.0

20.0

80.0

80.0

60.0

60.0

Study design

 Randomized (n = 63)

74.6

77.8

15.9

22.2

44.4

47.6

20.6

20.6

 Non-randomized interventional (n = 54)

74.1

74.1

0.0

0

31.5

33.3

9.3

9.3

 Observational (n = 67)

91.0

95.5

10.4

11.9

44.8

44.8

26.9

26.9

Data collected

 Quantitative (n = 121)

80.2

82.6

10.7

14.9

38.8

40.5

19.8

20.7

Qualitative (n = 12)

58.3

58.3

0.0

0

33.3

33.3

16.7

8.3

 Both (n = 51)

86.3

90.2

7.8

7.8

47.1

49.0

19.6

19.6

Source of funding

 Industry funded (n = 13)

76.9

76.9

0.0

0.0

30.8

30.8

23.1

23.1

 Non-industry funded (n = 171)

80.7

83.6

9.9

12.9

41.5

43.3

19.3

19.3

Year of submission

 2016 or prior (n = 135)

81.5

83.0

8.9

10.4

40.0

41.5

21.5

21.5

 2017 onward (n = 49)

77.6

83.7

10.2

16.3

42.9

44.9

14.3

14.3

Objectives from protocol state intent to assess feasibility (n = 136)

80.1

82.4

11.8

15.4

54.4

56.6

26.5

26.5

Objectives from protocol do not state intent to assess feasibility (n = 48)

81.3

85.4

2.1

2.1

2.1

2.1

0.0

0.0

Specific feasibility objectives stated in protocol (n = 131)

79.4

82.4

11.5

15.3

54.2

56.5

27.5

27.5

No specific feasibility objectives stated in protocol (n = 53)

83.0

84.9

3.8

3.8

7.5

7.5

0.0

0.0

Progression criteria stated in protocol (n = 62)

85.5

87.1

17.7

22.6

53.2

56.5

27.4

27.4

No progression criteria stated in protocol (n = 122)

77.9

81.1

4.9

6.6

34.4

35.2

15.6

15.6