Skip to main content

Table 2 Feasibility aspects based on registrations from occupational therapists, occupational therapy students, and clients

From: Feasibility of ABLE 1.0—a program aiming at enhancing the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons with chronic conditions

  Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 Session 5 Session 6 Final session
OT/OTS: Number of registrations: n (%) 30 (100) 25 (100) 21 (100) 8 (89) 2 (100) 1 (100) 20 (100)
Intervention component support progress toward goalsa 3 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 3 (2–5) 3.5 (2–5) 2 (–)
Client involvementa 4 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 3 (2–5) 3 (3–5) 3 (2–4) 2 (–) 4 (2–5)
Meaningfulness to clienta 3 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 3 (3–5) 3 (2–4) 3 (–) 3 (1–5)
Meaningfulness to OTa 4 (2–5) 3 (1–5) 3 (1–5) 4 (3–4) 3.5 (3–4) 3 (–) 4 (3–5)
Confidence in deliverya 4 (3–5) 4 (3–5) 4 (2–4) 4 (2–4) 3.5 (3–4) 3 (–) 4 (4–5)
Clients: Number of registrations: n (%) 25 (83) 25 (100) 19 (90) 9 (100) 2 (100) 1 (100) 20 (100)
Intervention component support progress toward goalsa 3 (1–5) 4 (2–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (1–5) 3,5 (3–4) 4 (–) 3,5 (1–5)
Being informeda 4 (2–5) 4 (3–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (1–5) 2,5 (1–4) 4 (–) 4 (1–5)
Being involveda 4 (3–5) 5 (3–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (3–5) 4 (–) 4 (1–5)
Meaningfulnessa 4 (3–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (3–5) 3 (–) 4 (1–5)
Overall satisfactiona 4 (2–5) 4 (2–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (1–5) 4 (3–5) 3 (–) 4 (1–5)
  1. As no clients received session 7, the table includes data from session 1–6 and the final session
  2. All aspects are rated based on a VAS scale from 1 to 5; 1 = very low degree, 2 = low degree, 3 = fair degree, 4 = high degree, and 5 = very high degree
  3. aBased on median and range as the VAS ratings are ordinal data.