Skip to main content

Table 2 Feasibility aspects based on registrations from occupational therapists, occupational therapy students, and clients

From: Feasibility of ABLE 1.0—a program aiming at enhancing the ability to perform activities of daily living in persons with chronic conditions

 

Session 1

Session 2

Session 3

Session 4

Session 5

Session 6

Final session

OT/OTS: Number of registrations: n (%)

30 (100)

25 (100)

21 (100)

8 (89)

2 (100)

1 (100)

20 (100)

Intervention component support progress toward goalsa

3 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

3 (2–5)

3.5 (2–5)

2 (–)

Client involvementa

4 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

3 (2–5)

3 (3–5)

3 (2–4)

2 (–)

4 (2–5)

Meaningfulness to clienta

3 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

3 (3–5)

3 (2–4)

3 (–)

3 (1–5)

Meaningfulness to OTa

4 (2–5)

3 (1–5)

3 (1–5)

4 (3–4)

3.5 (3–4)

3 (–)

4 (3–5)

Confidence in deliverya

4 (3–5)

4 (3–5)

4 (2–4)

4 (2–4)

3.5 (3–4)

3 (–)

4 (4–5)

Clients: Number of registrations: n (%)

25 (83)

25 (100)

19 (90)

9 (100)

2 (100)

1 (100)

20 (100)

Intervention component support progress toward goalsa

3 (1–5)

4 (2–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (1–5)

3,5 (3–4)

4 (–)

3,5 (1–5)

Being informeda

4 (2–5)

4 (3–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (1–5)

2,5 (1–4)

4 (–)

4 (1–5)

Being involveda

4 (3–5)

5 (3–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (3–5)

4 (–)

4 (1–5)

Meaningfulnessa

4 (3–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (3–5)

3 (–)

4 (1–5)

Overall satisfactiona

4 (2–5)

4 (2–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (1–5)

4 (3–5)

3 (–)

4 (1–5)

  1. As no clients received session 7, the table includes data from session 1–6 and the final session
  2. All aspects are rated based on a VAS scale from 1 to 5; 1 = very low degree, 2 = low degree, 3 = fair degree, 4 = high degree, and 5 = very high degree
  3. aBased on median and range as the VAS ratings are ordinal data.