Computerized cognitive training in post-treatment hematological cancer survivors: a feasibility study

Table 3 Cognitive outcomes at T1 and T2

	T1 (n = 19)		T2 (n = 14)		MD^a (95% CI)	Std
	Median	Range	Median	Range	MD^a (95% CI)	Std
Learning efficiency/memory	42.00	24.00–57.50	38.75	20.00–62.50	− 0.36 (− 6.35–5.94)	10.39
HVLT-R total recall	40	20–56	38.5	20–62
HVLT-R delayed recall	40	27–61	41	20–63
Information processing/psychomotor efficiency	44.50	28.50–54.80	45.63	29.25–63.25	4.18 (1.55–6.81)	4.55
TMT-A	45	28–67	51.5	32–64
WAIS-III digit symbol	46	30–63	47	30–70
Grooved Pegboard—dominant	39	11–58	42	27–63
Grooved Pegboard—non-dominant	37	22–57	41	20–58
Working memory	49.25	37.00–59.30	52.75	41.75–57.00	2.09 (0.51–3.67)	2.74
TMT-B	43	24–63	48.5	34–59
WAIS-III letter number sequencing	50	37–67	50	37–73
WAIS-III digit span	48.50	33–63	53	40–67
WMS-III spatial span	53	40–63	50	37–63
Executive functioning ^b	45.33	36.33–66.7	48.33	33.33 – 63.00	− 0.11(− 5.93–5.70)	7.57
WCST—total errors	48	31–80	52	29–69
WCST—perseverative responses	46.50	37–80	51	38–80
WCST—categories	40	37–40	40	33–40
Language (FAS)	38.50	25.00–55.00	40.50	25.00–55.00	0.79 (− 2.67–4.24)	5.99
Impaired, n (%)	11 (58%)		8 (57%)
Patient’s assessment of own functioning	22.84	1.00–86.00	23.69	2.00–55.00	− 3.92(− 11.14–3.30)	11.95

HVLT-R Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised [40], TMT-A Trail Making Test-Part A [41], TMT-B Trail Making Test-Part B [41], WAIS-III Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III [42], WMS-III Wechsler Memory Scale –III [43], WCST Wisconsin Card Sorting Test [44]
^aPairs used = 14, except for Executive Functioning domain where pairs used = 9
^bn = 16 at T1, n = 9 at T2

ISSN: 2055-5784