Skip to main content

Table 4 Outcomes analysis

From: A study protocol for a Pilot Masked, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Locally-applied Gentamicin versus Saline in Open Tibia Fractures (pGO-Tibia) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Outcome

Data

Method of analysis

Feasibility

 Enrollment rate

# enrolled per month

Descriptive statistics using means, proportions, and variances (no inferential statistics)

 Retention

% completing 1-year follow-up

 Data completeness

% complete data, including:

• Safety outcomes

• Treatment group allocation

• FRI criteria

Planned primary endpoint

 Occurrence of fracture-related infection

FRI criteria (time-to-event)

Relative hazard as estimated by two-sided binomial regression with the complementary log-log link, with a type I error rate (alpha) of 0.05.

Planned secondary endpoints

 Occurrence of nonunion

Nonunion criteria (binary)

Fisher’s exact test on the 2 × 2 cross-tabulation for binary variables

Comparison means of active agent group and placebo group using two-tailed Student’s t test (alpha = 0.05) for continuous variables

 Occurrence of unplanned reoperation

Review of complications (binary)

 Health-related quality of life

EQ-5D (continuous)

 Radiographic healing

mRUST (continuous)

 Clinical healing

FIX-IT (continuous)

 Suggestive FRI

FRI criteria (binary)

 Lost productivity

WPAI (continuous)

 Direct medical costs

Micro-costing (continuous)