Outcome/domain | Instrument | Data source | t0 | t1 | t2a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pilot effect study (with an embedded qualitative change evaluation)b | |||||
bvFTD | |||||
▪ Relationship ability | MM instrument [36] | Evaluations of videos of dyadic interactions by researchers | ● | ● | ● |
▪ Affect | QUALIDEM positive and negative affect subscales [37] | Proxy rating by primary carer | ● | ● | ● |
▪ Behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) | NPI [38] | Proxy rating by primary carer | ● | ● | ● |
Primary carer | |||||
▪ Sensitivity | SI [39] | Assessment of videos of dyadic interactions by researchers | ● | ● | ● |
▪ Stress experience due to BPSD | NPI-D [38] | Self-rating | ● | ● | ● |
▪ Manageability of BPSD | NPI-M [40] | Self-rating | ● | ● | ● |
▪ Goal attainment by intervention | GAS [41] | Self-rating | ● | ● | |
Dyad | |||||
▪ Quality of relationship | Assessment by primary carer | ● | ● | ● | |
▪ Social Interactionb | Videography of dyadic interaction in everyday life [44] | Videos, video transcripts and context information of researchers | ● | ● | ● |
Pilot process evaluation | |||||
Intervention process | |||||
▪ Benefits and perceptions of counselling | Quantitative interviews with 35 standardized single items | Primary carer | ● | ||
▪ Benefits and perceptions of counselling | Quantitative feedback questionnaire with standardized 11 single items | Primary carer | |||
▪ Promoting and inhibiting factors, appropriateness for the target group, doses and frequency, quality of counselling, etc. | Guided telephone interviews | Marte Meo® Therapist | ● | ||
Study process | |||||
▪ Recruitment rate | Recruitment documentation | Researcher | |||
▪ Recruitment, data collection, confirmation of bvFTD diagnosis | Field notes, documentation and memory protocols, reflections and observations on site | Researcher |