Table 1 Clinician characteristics and select outcomes
From: The feasibility of implementing an English language version of GLA:D Back
n (%) (unless other specified) | |
|---|---|
Age, mean (range) | 38 (24–58) |
Female | 15 (42%) |
Physiotherapist | 25 (71%) |
Chiropractor | 10 (29%) |
Clinic owner | 12 (33%) |
Self-employed in a clinic own by someone else | 11 (31%) |
Employee | 12 (33%) |
Clinical experience | |
0–5 years | 10 (28%) |
6–10 years | 6 (17%) |
11–20 years | 10 (28%) |
> 20 years | 10 (28%) |
Previous experience with GLA:D® for knee/hip | |
No experience | 15 (42%) |
Have referred to GLA:D in house | 10 (28%) |
Have referred to GLA:D in another clinic | 3 (8%) |
Have instructed GLA:D groups | 2 (6%) |
Evaluation of the GLA:D® Back training course, median (range) | |
Content (0–10) | 9 (5–10) |
Usability (0–10) | 9 (5–10) |
Novelty (0–10) | 9 (1–10) |
Overall impression of the GLA:D Back programme | |
Very good | 6 (24%) |
Good | 15 (60%) |
Neither good nor bad | 4 (16%) |
Bad | 0 |
Very bad | 0 |
Satisfaction with patient education materials | |
Very satisfied | 6 (24%) |
Satisfied | 19 (76%) |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 0 |
Dissatisfied | 0 |
Very dissatisfied | 0 |