Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive statistics

From: Implementation of an interprofessional collaboration in practice program: a feasibility study using social network analysis

 

District 1

District 1

District 2

District 2

District 3

District 3

Rings 1 and 2

Rings 1, 2, and 3

Rings 1 and 2

Rings 1, 2, and 3

Rings 1 and 2

Rings 1, 2, and 3

N = 16

N = 49

N = 19

N = 75

N = 20

N = 69

T0

T1

T0

T1

T0

T1

T0

T1

T0

T1

T0

T1

Number of contacts

 Avg. degree

5.13

7.56

5.79

7.00

4.00

5.53

4.25

4.31

4.81

6.20

4.68

5.26

 Density (%)

34

51

12

15

22

31

6

6

19

33

7

8

 E-I index

         

  Ring 1

         

   Internal avg. degree

4.8

7.5

 

3.6

5.1

 

2.0

3.8

 

   Internal contacts

26

38

 

42

56

 

8

14

 

   External contacts

32

44

 

28

43

 

38

51

 

  Ring 2

  

N.A.

  

N.A.

  

N.A.

   External avg. degree

4.0

5.5

 

2.4

3.7

 

2.3

3.2

 

   Internal contacts

20

22

 

24

24

 

102

98

 

   External contacts

32

44

 

28

43

 

38

51

 

 E-I index

         

 E-I index ring 1

0.10

0.07

 

−0.20

−0.13

 

0.65

0.57

 

 E-I index ring 2

0.23

0.33

 

0.08

0.28

 

−0.46

−0.32

 

Collaboration

 Reciprocity (%)

49

64

N.A.

25

27

N.A.

40

53

N.A.

Diversity of contacts

 Mean

0.32

0.42

 

0.36

0.42

 

0.26

0.32

 

 (SD)

(0.17)

(0.14)

N.A.

(0.15)

(0.19)

N.A.

(0.17)

(0.14)

N.A.

 Paired T test

         

 t p value

−4.39

< 0.001

 

2.05

0.055

 

0.91

0.371

 

Value of contacts

 Mean

 

7.3

7.7

 

7.6

7.8

 

7.5

7.5

 (SD)

N.A.

(0.67)

(0.47)

N.A.

(0.61)

(0.65)

N.A.

(0.64)

(0.58)

 Paired T test

         

 t p value

 

−1.28

0.209

 

−2.35

0.022

 

−1.12

0.267

Back to article page

Pilot and Feasibility Studies

ISSN: 2055-5784