Feasibility domain | Phase 2 refinements | Rationale for refinements |
---|---|---|
Screening and recruitment strategies | 1. The following exclusion criteria question was changed to: Has the participant received natural tooth replacement (removable dentures or fixed prosthodontics) for partial tooth loss within the previous 5 years? 2. The screening questionnaire was modified to incorporate additional patient information including GP details, type of natural tooth replacement, current oral health issues, method of recruitment, and note sections. A protocol giving a step by step guide for the researcher was also included within the questionnaire. 3. Addition of a poster advert to recruitment strategies. 4. Incorporation of offering home visits for study appointments. | 1. Tooth replacement criteria were widened to increase the pool of eligible patients in order to meet the proposed RCT sample size. 2. The screening questionnaire was modified to allow for a more robust and systematic screening process and to incorporate added requirements from the RCT. A step by step guide was integrated to ensure adherence to the research protocol and to facilitate a standardised screening process between researchers. 3. Poster adverts were put up around the Centre for Dentistry as a means of expanding recruitment. 4. Conducting study appointments at participant’s homes were offered in order to maximise engagement by overcoming accessibility barriers to the Centre for Dentistry. |
Data collection procedures | Additional questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and health outcomes from phase 2 were suggested for an RCT including: Questionnaires 1. An oral health section using the NDNS ‘Oral Health module’ [33]. 2. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [32]. 3. Oral Health-related Quality of Life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) [34]. 4. General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire [35]. 5. EuroQol Five Dimensions–5 level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) [36]. Anthropometric measurements 1. Waist and hip circumference 2. Body composition measurements Health outcomes 1. Muscle strength 2. Blood pressure 3. Blood and saliva samples | Phase 2 was primarily to test the feasibility of the intervention itself. However, in order to capture a wider overview of overall health outcomes, data collection measures were incorporated into a definitive RCT. |
Intervention delivery | 1. Collapsing the 6-week intervention session with the 2-month follow-up assessment. 2. The delivery protocol was amended to incorporate additional study measures and RCT follow up time points. | 1. It was apparent that a two month follow-up assessment was not required as study measures could be collected at the 6-week intervention session. A reduction in the number of study visits also reduced the burden of participant involvement in the study. 2. Amendment of the delivery protocol facilitated a better flow to study appointments and ensured adherence to the research protocol and appropriate documentation of participant data. |
Study materials | 1. Minor changes to the dietary intervention booklet. 2. Further development of a study equipment list, participant information sheet, invitation letter and letter of acceptance. | 1. Minor changes to the intervention booklet to amend noticed spelling mistakes/grammatical errors and to incorporate wholegrain serving suggestions [26]. 2. Further development of the study equipment list, participant information sheet, invitation letter and letter of acceptance allowed incorporation of RCT requirements. |