Table 4 Acceptability of the PSPAF intervention and cut-off points
Preliminary cut-off points | Threshold (%) | Observed values (%) | Cut-off point reached? |
|---|---|---|---|
The PSPAF intervention was considered acceptable when participants… | |||
1. Rated the intervention partly to very useful | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
2. Rated the intervention partly to very important | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
3. Liked the intervention partly to very much | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
4. Will eventually or definitively recommend the intervention to others | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
5. Rated the duration of the intervention as accurate | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
6. Rated the difficulty level of the intervention partly to very easy | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
7. Rated the comprehensibility of the intervention as partly to very high | ≥ 75 | 100 | Yes |
8. Rated the intervention partly to very helpful concerning dealing with AF in everyday life | ≥ 75 | 71.4 | No |
9. Did not experience any negative consequences related to the intervention | ≥ 90 | 85.7 | No |
10. Rated implementation of the content of the intervention in daily life partly to very easy | ≥ 75 | 71.4 | No |
11. Rated the likelihood of continuing a daily PSP twice a day as rather likely to very likely | ≥ 75 | 71.4 | No |
12. Were considered adherent to PSP (> 80% of possible entries were filled out) | ≥ 75 | 50.0 | No |