Skip to main content

Table 3 Model estimated difference in change of obesogenic behaviors attend vs. not attend on weekdays

From: The impact of summer programming on the obesogenic behaviors of children: behavioral outcomes from a quasi-experimental pilot trial

Hypothesis 2

Weekday attend

∆ HSL (n = 51) versus 21C (n = 57)

(interaction)

95% CI

HR

HS

Sedentary (min)

− 58.6

(− 104.3, − 12.8)

−

Support

MVPA (min)

36.2

(16.4, 55.9)

+

Support

Total steps

2799.2

(1594.4, 4004.0)

+

Support

Sleep duration (min)

− 4.4

(− 32.3, 23.4)

0

Support

Sleep onset

35.3

(− 4.3, 74.8)

0

Support

I-I SD for sleep onset

− 1.6

(− 50.3, 47.1)

0

Support

Sleep offset

9.3

(− 24.4, 43.1)

0

Support

I-I SD for sleep offset

− 19.4

(− 69.8, 30.9)

0

Support

Total screen time (min)

13.3

(− 29.6, 56.1)

0

Support

Screen time after 20:00 h (min)

21.1

(− 6.3, 48.5)

0

Support

Healthy foods/drinks

0.24

(− 0.14, 0.62)

+

Null

Unhealthy foods/drinks

0.22

(− 0.51, 0.95)

−

Null

  1. Abbreviations: HR hypothesized relationship, HS hypothesized support (i.e., did the relationship support the hypothesis), HSL Healthy Summer Learners, 21C 21st Century Summer Learning Center, I-I intra-individual; estimates are based on multilevel mixed effects linear regressions with days nested within children, all estimates represent combined data from schools 1 and 2 (i.e., summer 2018 and 2019); bolded values indicated a statistically significant difference at p < 0.05. Support indicates statistically significant difference in the hypothesized direction or no statistically significant difference when no difference was hypothesized, Null indicates no statistically significant difference despite a hypothesis that the means should differ, and Conflict indicates statistically significant difference that is contrary to the hypothesized relationship