Skip to main content

Table 2 Details for guideline adherence of the included studies

From: Pilot and feasibility trials in traditional Chinese medicine: a literature review of current practice

Number of item

Checklist item

Guideline adherence

Overall studies (n = 50)

Subgroups#

By type of pilot trial

By year of publication

FDT (n = 12)

NFT (n = 38)

Studies published before 2016 (n = 38)

Studies published after 2016 (n = 12)

Title and abstract

 1a

Identification as a pilot or feasibility randomized trial in the title

47 (94.0)

11 (91.7)

36 (94.7)

36 (94.7)

11 (91.7)

 1b

Structured summary of pilot trial design, methods, results, and conclusions (for specific guidance see CONSORT abstract extension for pilot trials)

37 (74.0)

9 (75.0)

28 (73.7)

27 (71.1)

10 (83.3)

Introduction

 2a

Scientific background and explanation of rationale for future definitive trial, and reasons for randomized pilot trial

11 (22.0)

3 (25.0)

8 (21.1)

8 (21.1)

3 (25.0)

 2b

Specific objectives or research questions for pilot trial

9 (18.0)

3 (25.0)

6 (18.4)

8 (15.8)

1 (8.3)

Methods

 3a

Description of pilot trial design (such as parallel, factorial) including allocation ratio

35 (70.0)

8 (66.7)

27 (71.1)

26 (68.4)

9 (75.0)

 4c

How participants were identified and consented

39 (78.0)

9 (75.0)

30 (79.0)

29 (76.3)

10 (83.3)

 5

The interventions for each group with sufficient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered

44 (88.0)

10 (83.3)

34 (89.5)

34 (89.5)

10 (83.3)

 6a

Completely defined prespecified assessments or measurements to address each pilot trial objective specified in 2b, including how and when they were assessed

44 (88.0)

10 (83.3)

34 (89.5)

34 (89.5)

10 (83.3)

 6c

If applicable, prespecified criteria used to judge whether, or how, to proceed with future definitive trial

2 (4.0)

1 (8.3)

1 (2.6)

1 (2.6)

1 (8.3)

 7a

Rationale for numbers in the pilot trial

4 (8.0)

3 (25.0)*

1 (2.6)*

3 (7.9)

1 (8.3)

 12a

Methods used to address each pilot trial objective whether qualitative or quantitative

48 (96.0)

11 (91.7)

37 (97.3)

21 (55.3)*

12 (100.0)*

Results

 13a

For each group, the numbers of participants who were approached and/or assessed for eligibility, randomly assigned, received intended treatment, and were assessed for each objective

34 (68.0)

10 (83.3)

24 (63.2)

26 (68.4)

8 (66.7)

Discussion

 20

Pilot trial limitations, addressing sources of potential bias, and remaining uncertainty about feasibility

33 (66.0)

7 (58.3)*

13 (34.2)*

27 (71.1)

6 (50.0)

 21

Generalizability (applicability) of pilot trial methods and findings to future definitive trial and other studies

9 (18.0)

3 (25.0)

6 (15.8)

7 (18.4)

2 (16.7)

 22a

Implications for progression from pilot to future definitive trial, including any proposed amendments

31 (62.0)

6 (50.0)

25 (65.8)

24 (63.2)

7 (58.3)

  1. #two subgroup analyses conducted by study type (FDT vs NFT) and publication year (before 2016 vs after 2016)
  2. *p value < 0.05 for difference test