Skip to main content

Table 4 Individual and group EVPPI under all bias scenarios

From: Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of a low-friction environment following skin graft in patients with burn injury

 

Probability regraft

Relative risk

Cost regraft

Cost no regraft

Utility post surgery

Utility following regraft

Utility following no regraft

Probability regraft and relative risk

Probability regraft, relative risk, and all costs.

All costs

All utilities

Total

1. Face value (base case)

1.66

0.00

16.06

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.83

20.27

16.69

0.00

20.29

2. No bias, high uncertainty

0.57

13.45

13.85

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

15.83

31.11

14.25

0.00

30.69

3. Bias in favour low-friction, high uncertainty

0.06

9.96

12.16

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

10.94

26.35

13.20

0.00

25.02

4. Bias against low-friction, high uncertainty

3.65

24.81

19.33

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

28.69

43.49

19.65

0.00

43.47

5. No bias, low uncertainty

1.41

0.82

15.51

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

3.77

21.71

16.17

0.00

21.74

6. Bias in favour of low-friction, low uncertainty

0.23

0.04

12.70

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.88

16.76

13.64

0.00

16.80

7. Bias against low-friction, low uncertainty

7.05

7.27

22.81

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

14.30

32.63

23.25

0.00

32.64

  1. Probability re-graft is the (absolute) probability of re-graft (as determined by the proportion of patients with skin graft failures on low-friction bedding). Relative risk is the ratio of the risks of regraft due to skin graft failure (low-friction vs standard bedding)