Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of inputs used in model

From: Cost-effectiveness and value of information analysis of a low-friction environment following skin graft in patients with burn injury

Variable

Estimates (credible interval)

Distribution

n

Source/assumption

Relative risk (regraft) [low-friction vs. standard]

0.574 (0.52, 0.63)

Lognormal (− 0.56,0.61)

221

Before and after comparison—Silkie feasibility study

P (regraft) low-friction

0.038 (0.013, 0.077)

Beta (4.96,125.04)

90

Prospective data collection—Silkie feasibility study

Intervention cost, £

115

Deterministic

131

Estimate based on unit costing approach

Cost (re-graft), £

19,321 (9092, 36,251)

Lognormal (9.81, 0.35)

131

“”

Cost (no regraft), £

9908 (8319, 11,705)

Lognormal (9.20, 0.09))

131

“”

Utility post surgery

0.353 (0.0056, 0.91)

Beta (0.77,1.41)

40

Prospective data collection—Silkie feasibility study

Utility no graft loss

0.508 (0.11, 0.90)

Beta (2.26, 2.19)

27

Prospective data collection—Silkie feasibility study

Utility graft loss

0.627 (0.57, 0.68)

Beta (179.95, 106.82)

2

 

Discount rate

0.035 (−)

Deterministic

n/a

NICE methods of technology appraisal (2013)