Table 4 Information on health status at baseline from different sources
Health status | |
|---|---|
Reported by physician: Charlson Comorbidity Index, n (%) | |
6 | 28 (87.5) |
7 | 2 (6.3) |
13 | 1 (3.1) |
Reported by Cancer Registry: Karnofsky Index, n (%) | |
90–100% | 7 (22.6) |
70–80% | 3 (9.7) |
No information on Karnofsky Index in Cancer Registries available | 7 (22.6) |
missing | 14 (45.2) |
45.2)Self-rated quality of life (EORTC-QL-2 (Version 3)) by n = 30 patients (pCRF): 7-point Likert Scale, mean (std) | 4.9 (± 1.2) |
Self-rated quality of life (EORTC-QL-2 (Version 3)) by n = 7 patients (APP, eCRF): 7-point Likert Scale, mean (std) | 5.9 (± 0.9) |
Consistency of self-reported quality of life between pCRF and APP at baseline (n = 7), Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.90 |
Self-rated health status (EORTC-QL-2 (Version 3)) by n = 30 patients (pCRF): 7-point Likert Scale, mean (std) | 4.8 (± 1.2) |
Self-rated health status (EORTC-QL-2 (Version 3)) by n = 7 patients (APP, eCRF): 7-point Likert Scale, mean (std) | 5.6 (± 1.3) |
Consistency of self-reported health status between pCRF and APP at baseline, Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.96 |