Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes, timeline, and data sources

From: Pilot randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention for diabetes self-management supported by volunteers, technology, and interprofessional primary health care teams

Pilot outcomes

 Process measures of recruitment, retention, and program participation

Data source

  Proportion of family practices that participated

Response via paper patient list

  Number of patients generated in EMR query

EMR Query output (Excel document)

  Number of patients excluded based on inclusion and exclusion criteria (with reasons for exclusion)

Research files—data from provider exclusion, chart audit exclusion, or exclusion based on phone conversation with patient

  Number of participants recruited

Research files

  Appropriateness of randomization process

Research files

  Number of participants who withdrew (with reasons for withdrawal)

Research files—data from clients

  Number of participants who completed the intervention

Research files

  Proportion of participants who completed each Healthy Lifestyle App survey

Healthy Lifestyle App

  Questions missed in completed Healthy Lifestyle App surveys

Healthy Lifestyle App

  Number of volunteers recruited

Volunteer agency files

  Number of volunteers trained

Volunteer agency files

  Number of client encounters made by volunteers, and type

Healthy Lifestyle App

  Number of reports sent to the clinic and seen by the interprofessional huddle team

Research tracking based on reports created from Healthy Lifestyle App data and sent to EMR

 Other pilot outcomes

Data source

  Perceived program feasibility

Qualitative interviews

  Risks or safety issues arising from this pilot

Qualitative interviews

Trial outcome assessment

 Outcome

Outcome measure

Time collected

Data source

  Diabetes self-efficacy

Stanford Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale [28]

T0, T4

In-person sessions with research staff

Eight items, ranges from 1 to 10, higher scores indicate better self-efficacy for managing diabetes

  Self-efficacy in managing chronic disease

Stanford self-efficacy for managing chronic disease [29]

T0, T4

In-person sessions with research staff

6 items, score ranges from 1 to 10, higher scores indicate better self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases

  Readiness to change

Readiness to change questionnaire (based on a cardiovascular version [30])

T0, T4

In-person sessions with research staff

3 items, score ranges from 1 to 5, lower scores indicate higher readiness to change

  Physical activity

Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA)—Aerobic Sub-scale [31]

T0, T4

For T0 baseline intervention: Healthy Lifestyle app

7 items, score ranges from 1 to 7, higher scores indicate more physical activity (< 6 indicates suboptimal activity)

For control group and T4: in-person sessions with research staff

  HbA1c

EMR Chart Audit

T−12, T0, T4, T10*

EMR

  Perceived patient empowerment

Patient Empowerment [32]

T0, T4

In-person sessions with research staff

5 items, score ranges from 1 to 4, higher scores represent perceiving more empowerment from the health care team

  Patient-centeredness that participants perceive of their primary care clinic

Patient-centeredness [32]

T0, T4

In-person sessions with research staff

6 items, score ranges from 1 to 4, higher scores represent perceiving the health care team as more patient-centered

  Satisfaction with healthcare

Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) [33]

T0, T4

In-person sessions with research staff

20 items, score ranges from 1 to 10, higher scores represent more positive assessment of care

  Attainment of health goals

Goal attainment scaling

T4

In-person sessions with research staff

Score ranges from − 10 to 110, with higher scores indicating better perception of goal attainment

Qualitative data

 Measure

Time collected

Data source

  Qualitative patient interviews

T4

In-person interview with research staff

  1. *Timelines were not always possible due to the constraints of using existing EMR chart data, so the closest available readings were included
  2. EMR electronic medical record