Open Peer Review Reports for: Can meditation improve attention in older adults? Study protocol for a 4-week proof-of-concept intervention
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Jul 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Lindsay S. Nagamatsu |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jul 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Aug 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susanne Finnegan |
13 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Delbaere |
20 Dec 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Lindsay S. Nagamatsu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Dec 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kim Delbaere |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Publishing | ||
1 Feb 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Feb 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s40814-019-0413-x |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.