Skip to main content

Table 4 Feasibility, acceptability, ease of use, and satisfaction with MT4C-In Care at 1 month and 2 months of data collection

From: Mixed-methods single-arm repeated measures study evaluating the feasibility of a web-based intervention to support family carers of persons with dementia in long-term care facilities

 

1 month

2 months

 

Agree to strongly agree

Neutral

Disagree to strongly disagree

 

Agree to strongly agree

Neutral

Disagree to strongly disagree

Ease of use

N

n (%)

N

n (%)

 1. Directions were clear for each activity I wanted to do

27

24 (89)

3 (11)

0 (0)

25

23 (92)

2 (8)

0 (0)

 2. I was sure about what to do with each activity I wanted to do

27

21 (78)

5 (19)

1 (3)

24

20 (83)

4 (17)

0 (0)

 3. The online format of MT4C-In Care is easy to use

27

25 (93)

1 (3)

1 (3)

25

23 (92)

1 (4)

1 (4)

Feasibility

N

n (%)

N

n (%)

 1. I had enough energy to complete each activity I wanted to do

27

17 (63)

4 (15)

6 (22)

24

15 (63)

5 (21)

3 (17)

 2. I had enough time to complete each activity I wanted to do

27

16 (59)

4 (15)

7 (26)

24

11 (46)

7 (29)

6 (25)

 3. I was able to complete all the activities I wanted to do

27

18 (67)

5 (19)

4 (15)

25

13 (52)

5 (20)

7 (28)

 4. The online format of MT4C-In Care is convenient for me

27

25 (93)

1 (3)

1 (3)

26

22 (85)

1 (3)

3 (12)

Acceptability

N

n (%)

N

n (%)

 1. MT4C-In Care increased my ability to deal with significant changes

27

16 (59)

7 (26)

4 (15)

24

18 (75)

3 (12)

3 (12)

 2. I would recommend MT4C-In Care to someone else

27

25 (93)

1 (3)

1 (3)

25

23 (92)

1 (4)

1 (4)

 

1 month

2 months

  

Greatly satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

 

Greatly satisfied

Satisfied

Dissatisfied

Satisfaction

N

n (%)

N

n (%)

 1. Please tell us how satisfied you were with the toolkit

26

9(35.1)

16(62)

1(2.7)

26

13(50)

10(38)

3(11.5)