Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Technology-based functional assessment in early childhood intervention: a pilot study

  • Mary A. Khetani1Email author,
  • Beth M. McManus2,
  • Kristen Arestad3,
  • Zachary Richardson2,
  • Renee Charlifue-Smith4,
  • Cordelia Rosenberg4 and
  • Briana Rigau5
Contributed equally
Pilot and Feasibility Studies20184:65

Received: 26 July 2017

Accepted: 13 March 2018

Published: 21 March 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
26 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tracey-Lee Cloete
6 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gareth McCray
26 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mary Khetani
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mary Khetani
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
21 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s40814-018-0260-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Departments of Occupational Therapy and Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), Chicago, USA
Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA
Children’s Hospital Colorado, Colorado Springs, USA
JFK Partners, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA
Children’s Participation in Environment Research Lab (CPERL), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA