The problem (the Qol impairment) |
1. The problem should be a serious condition for the patient either in terms of prevalence (e.g., pain, depression) and/or distress for the patient (e.g., itch, hiccup) or the result of late detection and management of the problem (e.g., a new or unusual distressing symptom occurred over the disease trajectory). |
2. The problem should be highly unlikely to be reported by the patient or recognized by the professional if not actively assessed. |
3. The trajectory of the problem should be sufficiently understood to assure a timely assessment to anticipate and appropriately address the problem. |
The assessment tool |
4. A validated, reliable, and sensitive-to-change tool for detecting and measuring the problem should be available. |
5. The tool should be practical and easy to use, and questions must not be distressing for the patients. |
The treatment-intervention |
6. There should be an appropriate treatment/intervention for patients with the recognized problem. |
The clinical intervention focused on Qol assessment |
7. There should be an agreed policy on which a problem (or a problem with a certain degree of impairment) has to be addressed with appropriate treatment or intervention. |
8. It should be possible for the tool to be appropriately administered by professionals trained in the procedure. |
9. The treatment-intervention for patients with QoL impairments should be available, with appropriately trained professionals. |
10. The cost of problem-finding (including all the steps from the administration of the tool until the treatment-intervention has been delivered in full) should be economically justified. |
11. QoL assessment should be a continuing process rather than a one-off assessment. |